79. This first part of this statement means that interpersonal―or social―skills can be
marketed as part of a bundle of assets that one might tout to a prospective client,
customer, or especially employer. Presumably, the extent and value of these skills can
be gauged by ones previous experience with clients and customers or at jobs requiring
a significant amount of teamwork and cooperation among workers―as measured by
factors such as ones tenure in such a job and letters of reference from supervisors.
While this claim seems plausable in the abstract, it ignores critical valuation problems.
Furthermore, the claim that the ability to deal with people exceeds the value of all other
commodities is an overgeneralization, since relative values depend on particular
circumstances.
The first problem with this claim is that it is far more difficult to quantify the
value of interpersonal skills, or other human qualities, than the value of commodities
such as coffee or sugar, which can be measured, weighed, or otherwise examined prior
to purchase. To a large extent, the ability to work with people is a quality whose true
value can be determined only after it is purchased, then tried and tested for a period of
time. Additionally, its value may vary depending on the idiosyncrasies of the job. For
example, a technically-oriented programmer or researcher might function well with a
team of like-minded workers, yet have trouble dealing with management or marketing
personnel.
The second problem with this claim is that it overgeneralizes in asserting that the
ability to work with people is worth more than any other commodity. The relative
value of this ability depends on the peculiarities of the job. In some jobs, especially
sales, ambition and tenacity are more valuable. In other areas, such as research and
development, technical skills and specific knowledge are paramount. Moreover, in some
businesses, such as mining or oil-drilling, the value of raw materials and capital
equipment might be far more important a commodity than the social skills, or most
other skills, of employees―depending on the economic circumstances.
In sum, the ability to deal with people is purchasable only to a limited extent,
since its full value cannot be determined prior to purchase. Moreover, its full value
depends on the organizational unit as well as the nature of the business.
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说inform sb to do sth吗
高二英语语法总结:名词性从句
高二英语语法解析:状语从句
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说fear sb to do sth吗
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说refuse sb to do sth吗
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说punish sb to do sth吗
alone, lone, lonely的用法区别
【高二英语】语法:形容词副词讲解
高二英语语法惯用法:不能说look at books吗
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说congratulate sb to do sth吗
高中英语语法讲解:名词性从句
高中英语时态用法详解之将来完成时
高二英语语法大全:倒装句讲解
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说hope sb to do sth吗
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说approve sb to do sth吗
【高二英语】语法:动词和动词短语
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说welcome sb to do sth吗
【高二英语】语法: 反义疑问句讲解及练习
高二英语语法惯用法:not to say还是not to mention
【高二英语】语法:构词法讲解
虚拟语气详解
高中英语词汇用法比较:have to与must,can与be able to
英语中多个形容词修饰名词的顺序
高中英语时态用法详解之将来进行时
高二英语语法惯用法:英语可说arrange sb to do sth吗
高二英语语法大全:过去分词作宾补
高二英语语法大全:promise的用法
高中英语助动词shall、will、should、would的用法区别
高中英语时态用法详解之过去将来完成进行时
英语中部分否定的几种表示方法
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |