79. This first part of this statement means that interpersonal―or social―skills can be
marketed as part of a bundle of assets that one might tout to a prospective client,
customer, or especially employer. Presumably, the extent and value of these skills can
be gauged by ones previous experience with clients and customers or at jobs requiring
a significant amount of teamwork and cooperation among workers―as measured by
factors such as ones tenure in such a job and letters of reference from supervisors.
While this claim seems plausable in the abstract, it ignores critical valuation problems.
Furthermore, the claim that the ability to deal with people exceeds the value of all other
commodities is an overgeneralization, since relative values depend on particular
circumstances.
The first problem with this claim is that it is far more difficult to quantify the
value of interpersonal skills, or other human qualities, than the value of commodities
such as coffee or sugar, which can be measured, weighed, or otherwise examined prior
to purchase. To a large extent, the ability to work with people is a quality whose true
value can be determined only after it is purchased, then tried and tested for a period of
time. Additionally, its value may vary depending on the idiosyncrasies of the job. For
example, a technically-oriented programmer or researcher might function well with a
team of like-minded workers, yet have trouble dealing with management or marketing
personnel.
The second problem with this claim is that it overgeneralizes in asserting that the
ability to work with people is worth more than any other commodity. The relative
value of this ability depends on the peculiarities of the job. In some jobs, especially
sales, ambition and tenacity are more valuable. In other areas, such as research and
development, technical skills and specific knowledge are paramount. Moreover, in some
businesses, such as mining or oil-drilling, the value of raw materials and capital
equipment might be far more important a commodity than the social skills, or most
other skills, of employees―depending on the economic circumstances.
In sum, the ability to deal with people is purchasable only to a limited extent,
since its full value cannot be determined prior to purchase. Moreover, its full value
depends on the organizational unit as well as the nature of the business.
SAT阅读假设题的解题思路
如何搞定SAT阅读词汇和长句这两大拦路虎
SAT阅读必知的文学术语
SAT阅读备考可多了解美国社会文化知识
SAT阅读备考的十条建议
SAT阅读填空的主要考察项目:词汇
SAT阅读主旨题解法简析
词汇量不足的童鞋如何巧答SAT阅读?
SAT阅读四大题型分析
SAT阅读部分的试题结构及应试技巧
SAT填空题最大的考察点就是单词
SAT阅读的两种逻辑题:假设和类比
SAT阅读资料推荐(文学类、科学类、社会类)
SAT阅读定位技巧指导
张旎:SAT阅读词汇备考的三大忌
SAT填空题解题技巧:整理归纳意群
SAT阅读考试的要点解读
得阅读者得天下 SAT阅读五大策略分享
如何根据SAT阅读考试特点和题型提升分数?
实例解析SAT阅读中的修辞手段
真题讲解SAT填空题中的取反信号词
SAT阅读技巧要建立在大量阅读的基础上
SAT阅读70分钟67道题如何把握答题速度与效率?
SAT阅读背景知识补充材料:文学术语(二)
SAT阅读填空题常考单词整理(7)
SAT阅读考试介绍
打造SAT阅读高分的十条建议
名师:SAT阅读的小清新
如何利用SAT阅读真题备考SAT词汇
实例讲解SAT阅读长难句如何分解?
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |