The following is an excerpt from a memo written by the head of a governmental department. Neither stronger ethics regulations nor stronger enforcement mechanisms are necessary to ensure ethical behavior by companies doing business with this department. We already have a code of ethics that companies doing business with this department are urged to abide by, and virtually all of these companies have agreed to follow it. We also know that the code is relevant to the current business environment because it was approved within the last year, and in direct response to specific violations committed by companies with which we were then working―not in abstract anticipation of potential violations, as so many such codes are. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument, the head of a government department concludes that the department does not need to strengthen either its ethics regulations or its enforcement mechanisms in order to encourage ethical behavior by companies with which it does business. The first reason given is that businesses have agreed to follow the departments existing code of ethics. The second reason is that the existing code is relevant to the current business environment. This argument is unacceptable for several reasons.
The sole support for the claim that stronger enforcement mechanisms are unnecessary comes from the assumption that companies will simply keep their promises to follow the existing code. But, since the department head clearly refers to rules violations by these same businesses within the past year, his faith in their word is obviously misplaced. Moreover, it is commonly understood that effective rules carry with them methods of enforcement and penalties for violations.
To show that a strengthened code is unnecessary, the department head claims that the existing code of ethics is relevant. In partial clarification of the vague term relevant, we are told that the existing code was approved in direct response to violations occurring in the past year. If the full significance of being relevant is that the code responds to last years violations, then the department head must assume that those violations will be representative of all the kinds of ethics problems that concern the department. This is unlikely; in addition, thinking so produces an oddly short-sighted idea of relevance.
Such a narrow conception of the relevance of an ethics code points up its weakness. The strength of an ethics code lies in its capacity to cover many different instances of the general kinds of behavior thought to be unethical―to cover not only last years specific violations, but those of previous years and years to come. Yet this author explicitly rejects a comprehensive code, preferring the existing code because it is relevant and not in abstract anticipation of potential violations.
In sum, this argument is naive, vague and poorly reasoned. The department head has not given careful thought to the connection between rules and their enforcement, to what makes an ethics code relevant, or to how comprehensiveness strengthens a code. In the final analysis, he adopts a backwards view that a history of violations should determine rules of ethics, rather than the other way around.
“烤鸭”必读:雅思口语应该“背”考么
高分技能:20句雅思写作经典句型背诵
笔译专家支招雅思考试技巧:攻核心词勤练手
首战雅思阅读8.5分:学霸20天炼成记录
“烤鸭”必备:雅思阅读高分必备关系词
备考分享:详解雅思听力中的对话与独白
雅思听力备考秘籍:常用信号词分类整理
“烤鸭”必读:雅思听力训练的三个注意要点
考生必读:雅思听力的几个长期练习方法
考场经验:雅思听力易混淆词汇的处理办法
提高雅思口语的捷径:放开胆子跟老外侃
雅思口语身份确认应答中博得考官好感的方法
经验分享:雅思听力考试高分的13条基本原则
为什么你的雅思听力上不了6.5?
考生必读:雅思阅读的所有句型结构分析
雅思阅读趋势:文章题材更贴近生活
每日雅思词汇:恋爱的不同阶段该如何表达
全面解读雅思口语考试评分标准和备考技巧
经验分享:高中生考雅思的弱势及解决方法
雅思口语:中国考生如何避免说中式英语
雅思听力两大基础:形象知识及抽象技能
考生必读:拿下雅思听力高分的七个步骤
“烤鸭”必读:雅思7分必须知道的九类词组
雅思考试快速入门必备的五条“黄金法则”
雅思阅读填空题五大解题技巧
备考分享:如何保证雅思阅读的做题质量
从技巧到能力:手把手教你雅思9分备考攻略
必读:雅思阅读选择题如何应对干扰项
中国考生雅思口语低分三大原因分析
分析根源诊治雅思口语“哑口无言”致命问题
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |