The following is an excerpt from a memo written by the head of a governmental department. Neither stronger ethics regulations nor stronger enforcement mechanisms are necessary to ensure ethical behavior by companies doing business with this department. We already have a code of ethics that companies doing business with this department are urged to abide by, and virtually all of these companies have agreed to follow it. We also know that the code is relevant to the current business environment because it was approved within the last year, and in direct response to specific violations committed by companies with which we were then working―not in abstract anticipation of potential violations, as so many such codes are. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument, the head of a government department concludes that the department does not need to strengthen either its ethics regulations or its enforcement mechanisms in order to encourage ethical behavior by companies with which it does business. The first reason given is that businesses have agreed to follow the departments existing code of ethics. The second reason is that the existing code is relevant to the current business environment. This argument is unacceptable for several reasons.
The sole support for the claim that stronger enforcement mechanisms are unnecessary comes from the assumption that companies will simply keep their promises to follow the existing code. But, since the department head clearly refers to rules violations by these same businesses within the past year, his faith in their word is obviously misplaced. Moreover, it is commonly understood that effective rules carry with them methods of enforcement and penalties for violations.
To show that a strengthened code is unnecessary, the department head claims that the existing code of ethics is relevant. In partial clarification of the vague term relevant, we are told that the existing code was approved in direct response to violations occurring in the past year. If the full significance of being relevant is that the code responds to last years violations, then the department head must assume that those violations will be representative of all the kinds of ethics problems that concern the department. This is unlikely; in addition, thinking so produces an oddly short-sighted idea of relevance.
Such a narrow conception of the relevance of an ethics code points up its weakness. The strength of an ethics code lies in its capacity to cover many different instances of the general kinds of behavior thought to be unethical―to cover not only last years specific violations, but those of previous years and years to come. Yet this author explicitly rejects a comprehensive code, preferring the existing code because it is relevant and not in abstract anticipation of potential violations.
In sum, this argument is naive, vague and poorly reasoned. The department head has not given careful thought to the connection between rules and their enforcement, to what makes an ethics code relevant, or to how comprehensiveness strengthens a code. In the final analysis, he adopts a backwards view that a history of violations should determine rules of ethics, rather than the other way around.
高考英语满分的作文Tiger(老虎)
高考英语的作文给报社写信关于土地荒漠化的英语作文
2008年高考英语写作指导范文的精选
高考英语的满分作文 How to Spend Sundays(如何度过星期天)
高考英语作文的详解说明文
2008年高考英语应对策略与基础写作的指导
高考英语的作文Bamboo(竹子)
高中英语的作文Stop Polluting the Water(停止污染水)
高考英语作文的详解议论文
高考英语作文的模版推荐三
高中英语作文 Keeping Water Sources Clean(保持水源清洁)
高考英语的作文:幸福的家庭
高考英语书面表达的范文30套
高考英语作文的详解日记
高考英语作文的模版推荐二
高考英语作文关于良好的师生关系
高考英语作文的满分范文写邮件简述18岁成人宣誓仪式的感受
高考英语的作文 Dogs(狗)
高考英语作文之日记的写作指南
2003年上海高考英语作文的范文
高考英语的作文时间是宝贵的(THE VALUE OF TIME)
高考英语的满分作文(幸福的家庭)
高考英语的作文带翻译 The EConomic Zone(海南经济特区)
奥运英语作文关于北京奥运会闭幕式
高考英文的写作务必提高“结构设计能力”
高考英语作文的评分标准
高考英语作文请简要阐述为什么学生们渴望上大学呢
高考英语的满分作文公园要不要收门票?
高考英语作文的详解书信
高考英语作文的带翻译 The Childrens Park(儿童公园)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |