2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company. When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event follows another , the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
星巴克用昆虫为饮品加色 或致哮喘患者过敏
华沙,听肖邦轻轻吟唱
美国女子误将中26万美元彩票送他人
澳大利亚四名“超胆侠”为避买单高楼跳伞
世上最性感十间卧室 哪间最令你向往?
英高官曝光911内情:内讧误事
土耳其军规:证明自己是同性恋可免服兵役
英国政府“拍卖”招生名额:优秀大学叫苦不迭
下一站是刘翔站?伦敦奥运地铁站改由体育明星命名
母熊助人狮口逃命
癌症准新娘婚礼90分钟前离世
西班牙妓女“性罢工”逼银行家帮穷人
英三分之二女性靠“事业线”平步青云
国际英语资讯:UN Mission in Afghanistan outraged by Taliban attack in Kabul
盘点父母最常撒的10个谎:你家爸妈说过哪句?
2017地球一小时:今晚我们可以做的10件事
每个人一生都值得尝试的5大职业
央视春晚入吉尼斯世界纪录
带狗上班可缓解工作压力
林书豪伤停6周常规赛报销 林疯狂暂告落幕
愚人节:愚人传统正在消亡?
奥巴马网上晒菜谱:总统的私房辣椒酱是这样做的
欧洲鸡蛋涨价 复活节彩蛋“伤不起”
出生性别比连降三年
女性穿着揭示隐藏性格
求职高峰到来,你的预算过签了吗?
一步 One step
巨型天鹅袭击游人的趣图
历史上受骗群众最多的五大愚人节玩笑
教师工资调查中国几乎垫底 仅为加拿大十分之一
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |