84. Requiring businesses to provide complete product information to customers
promotes various consumer interests, but at the same time imposes burdens on
businesses, government, and taxpayers. On balance, the burdens outweigh the benefits,
at least in most cases.
A threshold problem with disclosure requirements is that of determining what
constitutes complete information. Admittedly, legislating disclosure requirements
clarifies the duties of business and the rights of consumers. Yet determining what
requirements are fair in all cases is problematic. Should it suffice to list ingredients,
instructions, and intended uses, or should customers also be informed of precise
specifications, potential risks, and results of tests measuring a products effectiveness
vis-a-vis competing products? A closely related problem is that determining and
enforcing disclosure standards necessarily involves government regulation, thereby
adding to the ultimate cost to the consumer by way of higher taxes. Finally, failure to
comply may result in regulatory fines, a cost that may either have a chilling effect on
product innovation or be passed on to the customers in the form of higher prices. Either
result operates to the detriment of the consumer, the very party whom the regulations
are designed to protect.
These burdens must be weighed against the interest in protecting consumers
against fraud and undue health and safety hazards. To assume that businesses will
voluntarily disclose negative product information ignores the fact that businesses are
motivated by profit, not by public interest concerns. However, consumers today have
ready access to many consumer-protection resources, and may not need the protection
of government regulation. Although health and safety concerns are especially
compelling in the case of products that are inherently dangerous―power tools,
recreational equipment, and the like―or new and relatively untested products,
especially pharmaceuticals, narrow exceptions can always be carved out for these
products.
In conclusion, while stringent disclosure requirements may be appropriate for
certain products, businesses and consumers alike are generally better off without the
burdens imposed by requiring that businesses provide complete product information to
all customers.
牛津实用英语语法:311 间接陈述中的might,ought to,should,wo
牛津实用英语语法:270 go on,stop,try,used(to)
牛津实用英语语法:280 误连分词
牛津实用英语语法:291 虚拟现在时的用法
牛津实用英语语法:290虚拟语气形式
牛津实用英语语法:303 主动和被动时态对照表A 时态/
牛津实用英语语法:298 表示偏爱的另一些例句
牛津实用英语语法:330 for 和 because
牛津实用英语语法:302 被动语态形式
牛津实用英语语法:347 so和not可替代that从句
牛津实用英语语法:325 must和needn’t
牛津实用英语语法:329 though/although和in spite of
牛津实用英语语法:306 被动态动词后的不定式结构
牛津实用英语语法:285 might表示请求
牛津实用英语语法:316 say,tell及其他可替代使用的引导动词
牛津实用英语语法:314 间接引语中的不定式和动名词结构
牛津实用英语语法:272 现在(或称主动)分词
牛津实用英语语法:304 被动态的各种用法
牛津实用英语语法:326 并列连词
牛津实用英语语法:296 would like和 want
牛津实用英语语法:293 it is time+ 虚拟过去时
牛津实用英语语法:289 建议
牛津实用英语语法:262 动词+所有格形容词/宾格代词+动名词
牛津实用英语语法:314 间接引语中的时间及地点表达法
牛津实用英语语法:348 基数词(形容词及代词)
牛津实用英语语法:258 用做主语
牛津实用英语语法:322 let’s,let us,let him/them用于间接引
牛津实用英语语法:292 as if/as though+ 虚拟过去时
牛津实用英语语法:309 过去时态有时保持不变
牛津实用英语语法:345 位于某些名词之后的that从句
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |