总模板:
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that . However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that .. It is likely that , ..; it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument in question nee not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnot necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establisha general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. No evidence is provided to support this assumption. However there are all kinds of important differences between . and other making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B....Thus lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded.
Last but no least, the validity of the survey on which the argument relies is doubtful in itself. The survey cited by the author is too vague to be informative.
The claim does not indicate who conducted this survey and when and how the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results of this survey are worthless as evidence to support that.
Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.
美国“机遇”号发现火星上存在生命起源之水
欧洲民调:英国人称法国为欧洲最傲慢民族
每日一词∣海南自由贸易港 Hainan free trade port
2020全国翻译专业资格(水平)考试 英语口译三级考试大纲
国际英语资讯:Last passengers of coronavirus-stricken cruise ship disembark in Uruguay
新型小便器方便洗手 如厕讲卫生再没借口
《时代》曝光奥巴马高中舞会照片
科学家绘制出3D人脑高清模型
日本NHK电视台因过多使用外语遭控诉
哈里王子访美玩叠罗汉 英勇当底座
韩亚航空客机旧金山失事 2名中国女生遇难
奥巴马就黑人少年被杀案发声:马丁可能是35年前的我
白宫公布460名雇员薪水 奥巴马幕僚工资堪比副总统
韩亚空难理赔地不同 赔偿额可能差百倍
英国公司研发贵宾人脸识别技术
拉登隐秘生活曝光 超速被查牛仔帽护身
奥巴马将在白宫与希拉里共进午餐
日本天价方形西瓜受俄罗斯富人追捧
意大利海滩小镇禁穿比基尼 最高罚款500欧元
美国男子宣称发现可口可乐配方副本
苏格兰为孕妇提供吸烟测试服务
文件显示美监听38处驻美使馆和代表团
研究发现:空气污染显著缩短寿命
世卫组织:解除或放松疫情限制措施需考虑这6项标准
Steve Jobs 史蒂夫•乔布斯
人类头颅移植?意大利医生说能做到
亚洲最佳餐厅榜单 鼎泰丰登顶
杨洁篪:中美可建立更加密切的合作关系
李克强瑞媒发表署名文章:为什么选择瑞士
5G信号会传播新冠病毒?谣言!
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |