在gmat作文备考的过程中,如何才能明显提高gmat作文水平呢?对于计划参加gmat考试的人来说,可以通过分析OG范文中的优缺点来提高gmat考试中的作文水平,下面就来看看详细的介绍。
学习GMAT写作往往离不开北美范文,但其中良莠不齐,并非篇篇能称之为范,毕竟它们不是ACT/ETS所钦定的文章。如此说来,Official Guide上的范文就弥足珍贵,无论6分的还是5分、4分的都要仔细分析,尤其是其中所给与的分析和评论更是要细细体味,领悟其精神,然后用心实践。
下面是一篇官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文,我们来一起赏析,看看它为何能scored six
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
首段
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
中间段1
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
中间段2
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
中间段3
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
末段
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment . Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案3
2016届高考英语核心词汇知识点复习题33
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题1
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题8
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题10
2016届高考英语短文改错摸底选练试题1
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题7
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题4
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题9
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解调研复习题29
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解调研复习题30
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解调研复习题35
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题2
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题11
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案8
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案9
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解调研复习题31
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解调研复习题32
2016届高考英语短文改错摸底选练试题3
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案19
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解复习检测61
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解复习检测58
2016届高考英语任务型阅读基础选练6
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解复习检测60
2016届中考英语课时复习教案16
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案4
2016届中考英语课时复习教案11
2016届高考英语第二轮阅读理解复习检测57
2016届高考英语知识点能力选练试题3
2016届高考英语短文改错摸底选练试题2
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |