想要迅速提升GMAT作文的写作水平,考生首先需要参考大量的GMAT作文模板,并以此为基础不断总结,从而掌握GMAT作文的写作规律。下面就来为大家推荐一些GMAT作文的精品模板,希望能够为考生备考GMAT作文考试带来帮助。
开头段模板 The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that. Several reasons are offered in support of this argument. First of all whats more of equal importance is that. At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.
结尾段模板To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author would have to show that. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
选择性样本攻击 A threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic. The example cited, while suggestive of this trend, is insufficient to warrant its truth because there is no reason to believe that the sample is representative of the whole general group. One need only observe A to appreciate the truth that such evidence would be clearly unrepresentative of the entire general group for obvious reasons. In fact, in face of such limited anecdotal evidence, it is fallacious for the author to draw any conclusion at all.
样本数量攻击 Another problem that seriously weaken the logic of this argument is that the survey cited is based on too small a sample to be reliable. Offered in support of the argument, the only evidence is that. Unless it can be shown that the sample is typical of all general group, the fact that is groundless for claiming that.
Loaded question和诚实性攻击 Whats more, the methodology of the survey is problematic for two reasons. For one thing, we are not informed whether the survey provided only 3 alternatives. If it did, the respondents, who might very well prefer another choice not provided in the survey, might be forced to give up their preferences. For another thing, we are not informed whether the survey response were anonymous or even confidential. If they were not, regardless of whether the responses were truthful, the respondents might supply responses favored by their superiors who might conduct the survey. Both events would lead this survey unreliable, let alone about drawing the conclusion that.
样本代表性攻击Moreover, a possible methodology problem in this argument is that of bias. At first place, the term so many is too vague to be statistically meaningful. Even if by so many the author means nearly all, perhaps workers who were more interested than others in the survey might be more likely to respond to the questionnairepossibly because they found the questionnaire more attractive. Lacking in the information about the number of workers surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey. For instance, if 1000 workers were surveyed but only 10 responded, the result should be highly suspect. Because the author fails to account for other interpretations such as this, the survey would be useless in concluding that.
样本时效性攻击Last but not the least, it is necessary to point out another flaw that significantly undermines this argument that the author neglects to indicate how recently the survey was actually conducted. When used to generally claim a particular group, the samples should be close enough to support the generalization, so as to prevent historical changes from invalidating the generalization. All we know is that the survey is recently published. The less recent the survey itself, the less reliable the results to demonstrate that.
必要性攻击At first place, the author unfairly assumes that A determined solely by B. While B is a seemingly important element in determining A, it is hardly the only or even necessarily required element. This assumption overlooks other crucial criteria in determining Asuch as C, D, to list just a few. Accordingly, without accounting for these potential factors, the author concludes too hastily that these prescriptions cited are the best means of achieving goals.
充分性攻击At second place, the authors solution rests on the assumption that B is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals. However, if it turns out that A is due to a combination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, such as C and D, mere B might have no stimulating impact on A.
以上为大家推荐了一些GMAT作文考试的实用模板,考生可以适当参考,并通过大量的写作练习来逐步提高自己的GMAT作文的写作水平,从而在GMAT考试中取得更好的成绩。
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题06 动词及动词短语(原卷版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题21 阅读理解之广告应用文类(解析版)
国际英语资讯:Moreno officially wins Ecuador presidential election
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题01 冠词(原卷版)
国内英语资讯:Chinese president arrives in Finland for state visit
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题24 阅读理解之人物传记类(解析版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题08 动词的时态和语态(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习强化增分练:Unit 16《Stories》(北师大版含解析)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题17 完形填空之夹叙夹议类(原卷版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题10 定语从句(解析版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题18 完形填空之说明文类(解析版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题23 阅读理解之科普知识类(解析版)
国内英语资讯:Spotlight: Finnish people excited, hopeful about Chinese presidents visit
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题04 形容词和副词(原卷版)
体坛英语资讯:Iran to compete at Asian Womens Volleyball Championship
国内英语资讯:China hands over 4,000 tonnes of rice to Namibia
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题12 状语从句(解析版)
体坛英语资讯:Spanish football club signs accord to coach Chinese players
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题03 代词(原卷版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题02 名词(原卷版)
国内英语资讯:Chinese president congratulates Serbian president-elect
2017届高考英语一轮复习考点落实练:Unit 12《Culture Shock》(北师大版含解析)
网络缩略语小考 看你能闯到第几关
国内英语资讯:Xiongan New Area restricts housing purchase, construction
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题07 情态动词和虚拟语气(解析版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题07 情态动词和虚拟语气(原卷版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题18 完形填空之说明文类(原卷版)
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题03 代词(解析版)
体坛英语资讯:Hoffenheim upset Bayern, Dortmund win in German Bundesliga
五年高考(2011-2015)英语试题分项精解:专题05 介词和连词(解析版)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |