The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a popular science and technology magazine.
It is a popular myth that consumers are really benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. Grantedconsumers are, on the average, spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But consider that the demand for food does not rise in proportion with real income. As real income rises, therefore, consumers can be expected to spend a decreasing proportion of their income on food. Yet agricultural technology is credited with having made our lives better.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion of this letter is that consumers are not truly benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. The author concedes that, on the average, consumers are spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But the author contends that this would happen without advances in agricultural technology. The author reasons that demand for food does not rise in proportion with real income, so as real income rises, consumers will spend a decreasing portion of their income on food. This argument turns on a number of dubious assumptions.
First of all, while asserting that real incomes are rising, the author provides no evidence to support this assertion; moreover, it might be false. Even if salaries and wages go up, this fact may not indicate that real income has increased proportionally. Real income takes into account any effect inflation might have on the relative value of the dollar. It is possible that, when salaries and wages are adjusted for inflation, what appear to be increases in real income are actually decreases.
In addition, the author assumes that increases in real income explain why, on the average, consumers are now spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But no evidence is provided to show that this explanation is correct. Moreover, the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.
Finally, the entire argument turns on the assumption that benefits to consumers from advances in agricultural technology are all economic onesspecifically, ones reflected in food prices. The author ignores other likely benefits of agricultural technology that affect food prices only indirectly or not at all. Such likely benefits include increased quality of food as it reaches the market and greater availability of basic food items. Moreover, the author cannot adequately assess the benefits of agricultural technology solely on the basis of current food prices because those prices are a function of more than just the technology that brings the food to market.
In conclusion, this letter has provided little support for the claim that consumers are not really benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. A stronger argument would account for the benefits of technology other than the current price of food, and would account for other factors that affect food prices. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about whether real incomes are actually rising and whether this alone explains why consumers now spend a proportionately smaller amount of income on food.
雅思阅读长难句100句及翻译(4)
雅思阅读文章:反刍动物
雅思阅读文章:噪音的影响
雅思阅读需要重视图表题
雅思阅读速度慢的症结所在
雅思阅读文章:蚂蚁如何交流
雅思阅读辅导 给烤鸭的忠告
雅思阅读猜测词义与判断的方法
雅思阅读五步走提升策略
雅思阅读文章:儿童读物的发展史
雅思阅读文章:物种起源和大陆形成
雅思阅读文章:汽车的历史
雅思阅读常见短语大汇总(一)
雅思阅读文章:沙漠温室
"扫、扫、读、读"巧解雅思阅读题
雅思阅读文章:化学的发展
雅思阅读文章:儒艮 人鱼
雅思阅读摘要填空题型做题技巧
雅思阅读实力提升攻略
雅思考试该如何培养正确的阅读习惯
雅思阅读文章:传统管理与新型管理
雅思阅读文章:意大利妈妈为儿子真人秀选媳妇
雅思阅读作者及其观点搭配题答题技巧
雅思阅读实力挑战文章一篇
雅思阅读词汇:500强企业中英名称(二)
雅思阅读难句分析方法逐级解析(2)
雅思阅读文章:Marine life
雅思阅读文章:生化产品
雅思阅读6——6.5分= 能力 (70%) + 技巧(30%)
雅思阅读文章:加拿大移民史
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |