The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a popular science and technology magazine.
It is a popular myth that consumers are really benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. Grantedconsumers are, on the average, spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But consider that the demand for food does not rise in proportion with real income. As real income rises, therefore, consumers can be expected to spend a decreasing proportion of their income on food. Yet agricultural technology is credited with having made our lives better.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion of this letter is that consumers are not truly benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. The author concedes that, on the average, consumers are spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But the author contends that this would happen without advances in agricultural technology. The author reasons that demand for food does not rise in proportion with real income, so as real income rises, consumers will spend a decreasing portion of their income on food. This argument turns on a number of dubious assumptions.
First of all, while asserting that real incomes are rising, the author provides no evidence to support this assertion; moreover, it might be false. Even if salaries and wages go up, this fact may not indicate that real income has increased proportionally. Real income takes into account any effect inflation might have on the relative value of the dollar. It is possible that, when salaries and wages are adjusted for inflation, what appear to be increases in real income are actually decreases.
In addition, the author assumes that increases in real income explain why, on the average, consumers are now spending a decreasing proportion of their income on food. But no evidence is provided to show that this explanation is correct. Moreover, the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.
Finally, the entire argument turns on the assumption that benefits to consumers from advances in agricultural technology are all economic onesspecifically, ones reflected in food prices. The author ignores other likely benefits of agricultural technology that affect food prices only indirectly or not at all. Such likely benefits include increased quality of food as it reaches the market and greater availability of basic food items. Moreover, the author cannot adequately assess the benefits of agricultural technology solely on the basis of current food prices because those prices are a function of more than just the technology that brings the food to market.
In conclusion, this letter has provided little support for the claim that consumers are not really benefiting from advances in agricultural technology. A stronger argument would account for the benefits of technology other than the current price of food, and would account for other factors that affect food prices. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about whether real incomes are actually rising and whether this alone explains why consumers now spend a proportionately smaller amount of income on food.
关于雅思听力备考资料的相关问答
避免雅思听力失误的四个要点
雅思听力考试的9个要点(英)
练习雅思听力选择题(Multiple Choice)方法
雅思听力Section4的的题型及应试技巧
浅谈雅思听力的能力训练与外围准备
雅思听力考前十天的重点是调整生物钟的兴奋时刻
雅思听力备考要把被动词汇上升到积极词汇
雅思听力三个月备考计划分享
提高雅思听力水平的实战方法
雅思听力题型特点及解题突破要点
雅思听力高分必不可少的三个关键点
雅思听力考试的难点在于接近现实生活
考前三个月到考前十天的雅思听力备考建议
中国学生普遍存在的六个雅思听力误区
关于雅思听力备考的相关问题解答
心理素质的好坏会影响雅思考试分数
利用机经冲刺雅思听力6.5分的详细指导
雅思听力考试的六大原则
心理素质是雅思听力考试成败的关键
雅思听力考试需要哪些技巧?
雅思听力备考只需三千积极词汇
雅思听力备考要点讲解
雅思听力备考需实力与技巧并重
详解雅思听力学习的四个阶段及备考方法
雅思听力Section1场景、题型及技巧讲解
雅思听力辅导:精听泛听必须结合好
半个月提高雅思听力1.5分的备考方法
中国学生普遍存在的雅思听力误区
雅思听力答案撰写的三个注意点
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |