The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.
There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the authors use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.
Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.
Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.
In conclusion, the authors argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.
印度王妃登泰国版《Vogue》封面 展超模风范
求职必知:电话面试制胜七招
致拖延症患者:有10件事情拖延不得!
英设计出不锈钢高跟鞋 据称可保质千年
男人的衣柜:15个保养男式衣物的小窍门
你需要变强大:关于生活的14个事实
睡觉的时候,动物们都做什么梦?
感情问题会损害少女精神健康
38岁最胖女人获真爱 为婚礼能跳舞而减肥
奥巴马:如果普京溺水 我绝对会救他
美国网络家教网站蓬勃发展
7招教你塑造完美身形
看看全球收入地图 亚洲的中国究竟有多富
致夜猫子:手机影响睡眠 睡前别玩手机!
央视将引进《生活大爆炸》 推“绿色”译制版
饮食文化:十大特色中华美食的文化意义
开车不忘晒心情 下一秒车祸身亡
成功人士在午餐时间会做的10件事
给大学毕业生的五条建议
舌尖上的中国为何这么火?
阿里巴巴雄心勃勃进军视频业
《生活大爆炸》等多部美剧下架 且看且珍惜
舌尖上的名著:摄影师再现经典小说中的晚餐
最亲密的你:最好的朋友才知道的15件事
打印美食:专为老年人研发的3D打印食物
外资品牌在中国的艰难打假之路
九大事实为证:传统的性别角色?胡扯!
职场好习惯 我们为什么总是丢三落四
西班牙国会通过法律草案 孩子不做家务算违法
更多毕业生选择进入职场而非继续深造
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |