21. The following appeared as part of an editorial in an industry newsletter.
While trucking companies that deliver goods pay only a portion of highway maintenance costs and no property tax on the highways they use, railways spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The government should lower the railroad companies property taxes, since sending goods by rail is clearly a more appropriate mode of ground transportation than highway shipping. For one thing, trains consume only a third of the fuel a truck would use to carry the same load, making them a more cost-effective and environmentally sound mode of transport. Furthermore, since rail lines already exist, increases in rail traffic would not require building new lines at the expense of taxpaying citizens.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The conclusion of this editorial is that the government should lower property taxes for railroad companies. The first reason given is that railroads spend billions per year maintaining and upgrading their facilities. The second reason is that shipping goods by rail is cost-effective and environmentally sound. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
First of all, the argument depends upon a misleading comparison between railroad and truck company expenditures. Although trucking companies do not pay property tax on roads they use, they do pay such taxes on the yards, warehouses and maintenance facilities they own. And while trucking companies pay only a portion of road maintenance costs, this is because they are not sole users of public roads. Railroad companies shoulder the entire burden of maintenance and taxes on their own facilities and tracks; but they distribute these costs to other users through usage fees.
In addition, the author assumes that property taxes should be structured to provide incentives for cost-effective and environmentally beneficial business practices. This assumption is questionable because property taxes are normally structured to reflect the value of property. Moreover, the author seems to think that cost-effectiveness and environmental soundness are equally relevant to the question of tax relief. However, these are separate considerations. The environmental soundness of a practice might be relevant in determining tax structuring, but society does not compensate a business for its cost-efficiency.
Splitting the issues of cost-efficiency and environmental impact highlights an ambiguity in the claim that railway shipping is more appropriate. On the one hand, it may be appropriate, or prudent, for me to ship furniture by rail because it is cost-effective; on the other hand, it might be appropriate, or socially correct, to encourage more railway shipping because it is environmentally sound. The argument thus trades on an equivocation between social correctness on the one hand, and personal or business prudence on the other.
In sum, this argument is a confusion of weak comparisons, mixed issues and equivocal claims. I would not accept the conclusion without first determining: the factors relevant to tax structure, whether specific tax benefits should accrue to property as well as to income and capital gains taxes, whether railway shipping really does provide greater social benefits, and whether it is correct to motivate more railway shipping on this basis.
如何用英文表达“我不太想做某事”
2011年实用口语练习:当猪飞起来的时候
实用口语情景轻松学:我怀疑我是否能及格
英语口语:怎样放“狠话”让对方离你远点
2011年实用口语练习:各种哭的说法(二)
2011年实用口语练习:睡或不睡
实用口语:关于衣服的必备短语
2011年实用口语练习:别想宰我,我识货
2011年实用口语练习:Join a club 社团活动
2011年实用口语练习:出恭的各种表达
2011年实用口语练习:Select courses 选课
英文单词 “Do”的活用
如何用英语表达“原来啊…”
2011年实用口语练习:Assignment 家庭作业
2011年实用口语练习:5=击掌?
2011年实用口语练习:“锅中的火花”
英语口语-商业信函用语引言
2011年实用口语练习:生活奢华的猪
2011年实用口语练习:我是无辜的
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 偷得浮生半日闲ACT 1 - 2
2011年实用口语练习:课余阅读
2011年实用口语练习:各种睡不着
如何用英文表达“满意”
2011年实用口语练习:歉意如何说出口 1
2011年实用口语练习:英语客套话
如何用英文表达“你活该”
2011年实用口语练习:你把事情搞砸了
英语口语-商业谨致问候语
9句狠话教你怎么用英语让人“滚开”
2011年实用口语练习:遮人耳目
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |