The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
喀布尔发生汽车炸弹袭击,至少17人死亡
国际英语资讯:Turkeys Erdogan blames U.S. arms still flowing into Kurds in Syria
小测验 — 如何表达“同意”和“不同意”
体坛英语资讯:Kings Cup quarterfinal return legs promise thrills in Spain
Just the ticket 原来“一张票”可以表达“正是所需之物”
研究:女性是最难相处的家庭成员
国际英语资讯:Death toll rises to 95 in Kabul ambulance bomb blast: official
体坛英语资讯:Cavs close to a deal for struggling Kings guard
体坛英语资讯:Namibia Rugby Ltd appoints new CEO
国际英语资讯:Feature: Chinese keep lions share of intl admission by U.S. higher education
国际英语资讯:Conflict, climate change major challenges behind Africas hunger, poverty: UN
国内英语资讯:Heavy snow causes havoc in parts of China
体坛英语资讯:Cavaliers move Thompson into starting lineup, Jae Crowder to bench
研究:女性是最难相处的家庭成员
国内英语资讯:First volume of Xis book on governance republished
体坛英语资讯:Westbrook, Porzingis highlight 2018 NBA All-Star reserves
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Post-90s generation emerges as political force in China
体坛英语资讯:Viva China, Eredivisie champs Feyenoord launch nationwide youth training academy
体坛英语资讯:Mourinho extends deal with Manchester United
国际英语资讯:Moscow police detain opposition leader in anti-Putin rally
体坛英语资讯:Barcelona confirm Mascheranos transfer to Hebei China Fortune
国内英语资讯:Heavy snow wreaks havoc in east, central China
体坛英语资讯:Leganes win in the Bernabeu to spring massive cup shock in Spain
小白鞋好看不耐穿,该怎么清洗才能亮白如新?
国际英语资讯:Milos Zeman wins Czech presidential election
国际英语资讯:New U.S. sanctions not to damage Russian industry: Energy Minister
警报!警报!流感席卷全球,你中招了么?
体坛英语资讯:Leon Goretzkas move to Bayern causes consternation among Schalke fans
美文赏析:如果目标太远大,就不要注视它
国内英语资讯:China-ASEAN trade volume hits record high in 2017
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |