The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
大一新生向父母索要每月4500元生活费引热议
马来西亚蜜月行被绑架案打断
中国人何以对奢侈品趋之若鹜
专注吃砖20年:印度异食癖男子超爱啃砖头
再不疯狂就老了:年轻时要做的30件事
双语点评国外娱乐圈分道扬镳的姐弟恋夫妻
耶鲁女生太瘦被学校警告:我只是天生苗条
大量中国人去韩国考驾照 外媒看“新韩流”
想到就开心:14件事让你心情美美的!
15个生活小贴士让你的早晨不再匆忙
意外之财从天降 金发女郎购物忙
56岁女渔夫钓到823斤金枪鱼 市价200万美元
目的地清单:去世界上最美的10个地方旅行
成功者与平庸者之间的十大差距
娱乐圈的虚伪VS坦率?
大师们的5项日常活动:时间应该这样管理
放假在即:休假前你要做好的十件事
5招力量锻炼——燃烧脂肪,方便又快速
乔治小王子成威廉夫妇出访焦点
让人既爱又恨的葡萄酒 餐饮达人的心声
中国父母因一胎政策被迫网上弃婴
南非将在高校免费发放彩色香味避孕套
挪威熊孩子:少年手臂上纹个麦当劳账单
时光的秘密:老人收到亡妻48年前时间胶囊
乔治小王子出访引时尚风 随身袋鼠背包大卖
欧洲民调:德国女人最滥交
超美的大理石裙子:惟妙惟肖的雕刻艺术
职场调查:女人为难女人
WHO研究 2017年全球700万人死于空气污染
凯特王妃遇上露臀男该往哪里看?
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |