The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
雅思图表作文杀手锏:提分词汇大总结
雅思“机经”只可参考 过分迷信或得不偿失
摆正心态正确看待雅思成绩波动
雅思口语机经:10月27日28日话题汇总
五招教您挑选雅思托福培训机构
IELTS考情分析:《剑桥雅思9》烤鸭备考福音
有的放矢:透析雅思口语四大评分标准
专家支招:拿什么摆平你我的雅思口试
雅思剑9即将发布:阅读判断题考点全指导
雅思口语:让考官易懂的基本回答结构
烤鸭自述:3000词汇量如何拿下雅思阅读7分
“烤鸭”必读:雅思口语考试巧切题
对话考官:揭秘雅思口语考试两大注意事项
细节决定成败:盘点雅思写作地道表达
雅思阅读:9月考试预测及要注意四大要点
2013年4月13
雅思备考:十大细节助烤鸭超6争7
《剑桥雅思9》揭示雅思听力备考新方向
中国考生雅思作文十大常见失分点大集合
三步剔除雅思作文软肋:耗时没头绪中式英语
雅思口语难题详解:ELECTRIC equipment
雅思剑9发布:名师盘点阅读备考七大真经
《剑桥雅思9》出炉 阅读考题部分总结
《剑桥雅思9》揭示雅思阅读题型考察重点
剑9来袭 听说读写全面解析“剑9”谜团
“烤鸭”必读:解析雅思备考三盲区
揭秘“要命阅读题”的三种思维策略
三个笨方法让你轻松应对雅思听力考试
雅思备考:三大必杀帮你冲刺雅思阅读高分
雅思预测:2012年11月雅思考试重点大解密
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |