The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
体坛英语资讯:Leipzig overcome Tottenham 3-0 in UEFA Champions League
体坛英语资讯:Messi named in Argentina squad for World Cup qualifiers
国际英语资讯:Massive homecoming blocked as Indonesia ramps up strides to curb virus spread
国内英语资讯:China endeavors to ensure safe classes resumption amid COVID-19
背起行囊走四方
国际英语资讯:Some 100 people arrested a day in London for domestic violence during coronavirus lockdown
江上明珠——石宝寨
国内英语资讯:Chinese medical experts install CT scanner to help tackle COVID-19 in Iraq
沭阳地方农谚《九九歌》评析
吸烟不容易得新冠肺炎?这项研究引发了法国的尼古丁禁令
古诗中的四季
走进古诗中的雨
再见苏州
给安南先生的一封信
国内英语资讯:China extends small businesses tax exemptions by four years
古诗中的“炼字”艺术例说
国际英语资讯:COVID-19 infections reach 197,675 in Italy, single-day deaths lowest in six weeks
研究:新冠病毒或借助大气污染物颗粒传播
国际英语资讯:Yemens southern council captures all key state institutions in Aden
背着行囊走四方
组图:贝克汉姆携子观看世界杯决赛[1]
国际英语资讯:European tourism needs 375 bln euros to recover: ETC
体坛英语资讯:Peru defender Zambrano to miss opening World Cup qualifiers
泰国旅行记
文旅部提醒游客“五一”出游疫情防控不放松
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Wuhan hospitals clear all COVID-19 cases
神农架游记
苏州宝带桥
叶楚伧故居记游
古诗苑漫步之旅
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |