The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
2009年6月27日A 类雅思写作的回忆
2009年2月21日雅思口语考试的回忆
3月5日雅思写作真题及原创满分的范文
2009年3月7日雅思口语考试回忆的机经
2009年4月18日雅思口语的回忆
2009年4月25日雅思口语的回忆
2009年3月7日G类雅思写作考试的回忆
2009年4月18日雅思阅读的回忆
2008年4月5日雅思A类考试的回忆(二)
2009年5月30、31日雅思口语的回忆
2009年4月18日雅思口语的全回忆
2009年4月18日雅思听力的回忆
剑桥雅思7口语真题答题的示范
2009年4月30日雅思口语的回忆
2009年2月21日雅思听力的回忆
2009年3月21日雅思阅读的回忆
2009年6月20、21日雅思口语的回忆
2009年5月16日雅思口语的回忆
2009年6月20日雅思口语的回忆
考场再现:2.21日G类雅思精确的回忆
2009年2月21日雅思G类写作的回忆
2009年2月21日雅思A类写作的回忆
1月10日雅思口语的真题汇总
2008年8月16日雅思(ielts)口试真题的回忆
2009年3月5日雅思写作考试的回忆
2009年3月14日雅思写作的真题
2009年3月14日雅思听力的回忆
2009年1月17日雅思A类写作的真题
2009年2月28日雅思口试话题的回忆
2009年5月30日雅思笔试的回忆
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |