Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
名师解析剑八雅思阅读文章(类型对比)
雅思阅读低分的主要原因分析
雅思阅读真题文章:Nobel(2011.4.30)
雅思阅读长难句解析(共三例)
雅思阅读材料:Eye robot
雅思阅读词汇的备考要点指导
雅思阅读备考资料推荐
雅思阅读长难句翻译(共3句)
丁岳:雅思阅读填空题实例剖析
雅思阅读真题文章:农业
雅思阅读高分备考技巧:省略现象分析
雅思阅读多项选择题的答题方法介绍
雅思阅读长难句分析(共4句)
雅思阅读Headings题的三大解题重点
雅思阅读材料:帆船集团触礁落水
雅思阅读高分策略:如何正确阅读
名师解读剑桥雅思8阅读真题
两类最常见的雅思阅读信号词
雅思阅读图表题的三大解题方法
盘点雅思阅读最容易出错的题型
孙吉芯:雅思阅读难点突破-定位
雅思阅读真题文章:Science fiction
雅思阅读文章:IMF
雅思阅读材料:乔布斯斯坦福大学毕业典礼演讲
雅思阅读材料:Mars
雅思阅读材料:online advertising
雅思阅读材料:Barack Obama's speech on the Middle East
雅思阅读常见词汇20个
名师解读剑八雅思阅读题型
雅思阅读文章:加勒比海的绿宝石
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |