Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
雅思阅读8分考生备考的心得分享
不参加培训拿下雅思口语8.5分的经验
20天备考雅思7分复习的经验谈
雅思8.5高分考生的短期备考的经验
50天备考拿下雅思7分高分经验的总结
雅思7分备考之路让梦想照进现实
雅思写作高分考鸭独门心经
四六级基础考生首战雅思7分的经验谈
三次考雅思成功从4到6的转变
牛人G类雅思8.5分经验的分享
实用雅思考试实战经验小贴士
雅思各科备考高分的全攻略
英语基础一般一战雅思6.5分经验谈
六级水平备考雅思从5.5到6.5
非牛人雅思口语8分的训练方法
雅思总分8分的复习心得每天英语交流1.5小时
三战雅思终得7成功经验失败教训
雅思8分考生备考的经验分享
阅读听力双8分考生谈雅思的备考心得
二战雅思听力8口语7经验的分享
两次征战雅思听力均获8.5分经验的分享
雅思阅读9分备考方法及阅读的技巧
小牛人首战雅思7.5 听力阅读8.5的经验
雅思备考下苦功成就听力5.5到8分的飞跃
英语专业2个月备考轻松通过雅思考试
一战雅思7分分享备考经验教训
雅思阅读9听力8.5总分7.5高分经验谈
在职考生两年备考雅思7分的经验
雅思口语5.5到6.5的飞跃带着感情去说
初战雅思口语7分经验的分享
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |