Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
上半年雅思阅读考试内容的总结
雅思写作回忆2
雅思听力回忆2
雅思阅读主题1
雅思阅读真题及解析2
雅思笔试机经18
雅思口语真题及解析7
雅思G类写作真题1
雅思阅读真题文章2
雅思听力真题及解析3
雅思笔试机经29
雅思笔试机经27
雅思口试话题回忆11
雅思笔试机经19
雅思写作真题及高分范文1
雅思笔试机经25
雅思G类写作题目的总结
雅思口语真题及解析1
雅思A类写作真题及最新预测1
雅思大作文及高分范文11
雅思笔试机经1
雅思A类写作回忆2
雅思阅读回顾及解析2
雅思口试机经1
澳洲雅思口语考试回忆
雅思阅读真题及解析6
雅思口语机经7
雅思A类笔试机经1
雅思A类写作真题及分析
雅思阅读回忆2
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |