Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
《权力的游戏》中的毛皮大衣竟然是宜家的地毯
国内英语资讯:Xi urges all-out relief work after 7.0-magnitude quake hits SW China
国内英语资讯:Chinese naval fleet ends friendly visit to Latvia
辽宁省实验中学分校2016-2017学年高二6月月考英语试卷
金钱或许真的能买来幸福
今夏最火爆的时尚包包 你集齐了几款?
如何在玻璃上雕刻花纹?
花朵的祖先像白莲花和白百合结合体
NASA研发新型超音速飞机
瓶装水过期后请不要再喝
曝iPhone8取消Home键
丹麦亲王拒绝与女王合葬:死后不想再被压一头
你如何安排自己的午休时间
爹妈什么仇!这些奇葩名字简直倒霉透啦
国内英语资讯:Top political advisor lauds Inner Mongolia achievements on 70th anniversary
神秘村庄:女孩长大自动变男性
Help yourself! 自我帮助
大国角力的新领域:基因数据
怪异村庄:女孩到12岁变成男孩
你不该觉得离婚是件丢人的事
美勘探公司提议搜寻MH370 找不到不收费
网上疯转的健康饮食方式 或许并不适合你
腾讯开发信用评分系统 叫板阿里巴巴
哈里王子向女友求婚了?求婚的地点震惊我了
国内英语资讯:13 killed in China 7.0-magnitude quake
国内英语资讯:Chinese embassy in Rwanda sees off Chinese scholarship winners to study in China
最近比较火的大胸妹专用毛巾...你或许有需要
国内英语资讯:PLA Western Theater Command ready for rescue after deadly quake in Sichuan
研究:吃菠菜或引发老年痴呆症
小黄车联手蕾哈娜,发起全球公益事业
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |