Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.
Another problem with the argument is that the respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
GMAT写作指导:Official Guide范文分析
GMAT作文满分经验介绍
分享:GMAT写作中的非典型AWA5.5
GMAT作文高频功能段
如何写出结构清晰的GMAT作文
2014年GMAT作文题库最新热点追踪
GMAT作文范文:Issue (6)
GMAT作文高频功能段
GMAT作文满分速成法
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(12)
TOEFL/GRE/GMAT写作高频话题:合作精神
GMAT写作必备素材之科技发展素材
GMAT作文经验(附Argument和Issue模板)
备考指导:GMAT作文优秀范文参考(三)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(36)
GMAT作文指导:作文记忆法
GMAT考试改革:GMAT作文题库又添新内容
GMAT作文不跑题的好方法
分享:GMAT写作AA题库翻译
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(26)
GMAT作文范文:Issue (3)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(19)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(32)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(13)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(35)
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(4)
GMAT作文写作原则及技巧
GMAT写作经典闪光句型(6)
GMAT作文满分经验介绍
GMAT考试issue范文提纲(11)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |