The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper. This past winter, 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. The other 12,000 Waymarsh students evidently werent so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the states college students than are the protesters. Therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so with the knowledge that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
走进雅思 带你全方位了解雅思听力
看故事学雅思听力:餐饮主题“热”词归类
看故事学雅思听力:新生入学主题词汇
雅思听力7大陷阱需小心
雅思听力训练应培养猜字能力
详解雅思听力考试中的填空题
如何应对雅思听力中的填空题
为什么雅思听力第二遍才能听懂?
详解雅思听力中的顺序原则与重复原则
有效提高雅思听力成绩的八点建议
双向练习法让你的雅思听力备考事半功倍
雅思听力电话号码场景备考指导
雅思听力答案拼写和缩写问题不可忽视
教学经验:“三级跳”有效提高雅思听力水平
雅思听力的考试形式及题型解析
雅思听力咨询与申请场景的要点整理
雅思听力陷阱词之条件词
雅思听力中的理解、辨别和听写
打好雅思听力基础的练习方法介绍
雅思听力相貌场景备考指导
看故事学雅思听力:新生入学主题高频词汇
雅思听力名词复数形式的细节不可忽视
雅思听力常考英美国家的地名
雅思听力特点:文章场景性强 专业话题多
雅思听力提分谨记方法为王
详解雅思听力中的三大数字考点
雅思听力动植物场景词汇整理
雅思听力听说训练需要注意的三点
雅思听力中的“一分钟恐怖”和“连续作战”
避免雅思听力出现失误的应对方法
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |