为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了GMAT作文:Argument范文精选系列文章,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
In this argument, the head of a government department concludes that the department does not need to strengthen either its ethics regulations or its enforcement mechanisms in order to encourage ethical behavior by companies with which it does business. The first reason given is that businesses have agreed to follow the departments existing code of ethics. The second reason is that the existing code is relevant to the current business environment. This argument is unacceptable for several reasons.
The sole support for the claim that stronger enforcement mechanisms are unnecessary comes from the assumption that companies will simply keep their promises to follow the existing code. But, since the department head clearly refers to rules violations by these same businesses within the past year, his faith in their word is obviously misplaced. Moreover, it is commonly understood that effective rules carry with them methods of enforcement and penalties for violations.
To show that a strengthened code is unnecessary, the department head claims that the existing code of ethics is relevant. In partial clarification of the vague term relevant, we are told that the existing code was approved in direct response to violations occurring in the past year. If the full significance of being relevant is that the code responds to last years violations, then the department head must assume that those violations will be representative of all the kinds of ethics problems that concern the department. This is unlikely; in addition, thinking so produces an oddly short-sighted idea of relevance.
Such a narrow conception of the relevance of an ethics code points up its weakness. The strength of an ethics code lies in its capacity to cover many different instances of the general kinds of behavior thought to be unethical to cover not only last years specific violations, but those of previous years and years to come. Yet this author explicitly rejects a comprehensive code, preferring the existing code because it is relevant and not in abstract anticipation of potential violations.
In sum, this argument is naive, vague and poorly reasoned. The department head has not given careful thought to the connection between rules and their enforcement, to what makes an ethics code relevant, or to how comprehensiveness strengthens a code. In the final analysis, he adopts a backwards view that a history of violations should determine rules of ethics, rather than the other way around.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
澳大利亚最新电动公交华丽登场
错不在我:学生二度挂科之后起诉学校
2.25英寸法告诉你 该剪短发还是留长
清凉一夏:教你不花钱的消暑妙计
囧研究:毒舌的你更具智慧和创造力?!
7个错毁了你的面试 连自己都不知道
关于【软技能】【硬技能】,怎么分
10个不能加薪的理由,内附完整对策
10步成为百万富翁,这不是在做梦!
时差晕机不担心,10个习惯旅途顺心
外媒:化石燃料时代的终结?
抢先看!《小黄人》大电影中字预告3
电梯事故频发:看外国人在自动扶梯上作大死
玩转海滩度假全攻略
重大决定难做出?清理杂念第一步!
一招就脱单 爱了就要大胆说
世界那么大:旅行的N种正能量
热辣美眉总是单身的11个理由
你看我时很远 看电子设备很近
学营销,路边汽水摊告诉你道理五条
万万没想到:这5种食物烤着吃更美味!
白天容易打瞌睡?可能是老年痴呆的先兆!
法国开云集团起诉阿里巴巴
盘点历年世界环境日主题
压力不一定都会成为正能量
不是胸大无脑!如何成为维秘模特?
赶走负能量:开心生活只要这5招
囧研究:熊猫什么会这么懒
清凉一夏:教你不花钱的消暑妙计
《财富》:全球500强企业出炉 中国占98席
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |