为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The author of this editorial concludes that the guidelines for training pilots and maintaining equipment in the medical-helicopter industry are ineffective, even though they are far more stringent than those in other airline industries. To support this conclusion, the author cites statistics showing that the rate of medical-helicopter accidents is much higher than the rate of accidents for non-medical helicopters or commercial airliners. This argument is problematic in three critical respects.
The first problem with the argument is that it rests on the unstated assumption that accidents involving medical helicopters have been due to inadequate pilot training or equipment maintenance. However, the author fails to acknowledge and rule out other possible causes of such accidents. In fact, common sense tells us that medical-helicopter accidents are most likely to result from the exigent circumstances and dangerous flying and landing conditions which typifymedical emergencies where helicopters are required to gain access to victims.
A second, and related, problem is that the author unfairly compares the accident rate of medical helicopters with the accident rate for non-emergency aircraft. Medical helicopters are almost invariably deployed during emergencies to dangerous flying locales, whereas other types of aircraft are not. Consequently. medical-helicopter accidents will in all likelihood occur far more frequently than other aircraft accidents, regardless of pilot training or equipment maintenance.
A third problem with the argument is that the statistical evidence upon which it relies is too vague to be informative. The statistics concerning aircraft accidents may have been based on all types of accidents, whether minor or major. The statistics would be more meaningful if we knew that the accidents to which they refer were all of comparable severity. For all we know, the rate of casualty-causing accidents for medical helicopters is actually lower than for other aircraft. Additionally, we are not told the time period of the survey. An old survey or one that covered only a brief time period would be poor evidence in support of the authors claim.
In conclusion, the authors evidence does little to support the conclusion. To be persuasive, the author must at the very least acknowledge and rule out other possible causes of accidents that are unique to the medical-helicopter industry, in any event, a more effective argument would be based on a statistical comparison of accident rates under differing sets of training and maintenance guidelines within :he medical-helicopter industry, not among different aircraft industries.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案18
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案17
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案15
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案30
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案6
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案26
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案3
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案34
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案24
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案33
2016届中考英语语法知识点导学案12
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案4
Nelson Mandela课件1
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案29
Nelson Mandela课件4
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案8
Nelson Mandela课件13
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案27
My new teachers课件4
Nelson Mandela课件11
Films and TV Programmes课件3
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案15
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案20
Nelson Mandela课件7
My new teachers课件6
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案28
Films and TV Programmes课件2
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案19
2016届中考英语第一轮知识点导学案23
Nelson Mandela课件8
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |