为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The author contends that it makes good sense to reduce funding for mining regulation, because regulatory problems with over-mining and pollution will be solved when scientists learn how to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements. One reason the author gives for this conclusion is that the problem of over-mining will be quickly eliminated when the amount of potentially available copper is no longer limited by the quantity of actual copper deposits. Another reason given is that pollution problems created by production of synthetic copper substitutes will be eliminated when manufacturers no longer depend on substitutes. This argument is weak because the conclusion goes beyond the scope of the premises and because the argument relies on questionable assumptions.
To begin with, the wording of the conclusion suggests that funding for mining regulation generally should be reduced, yet the premises are about copper mining only. There are many mined resources other than copper; advances in copper synthesis technology will in all likelihood have no bearing on whether regulation of other kinds of mining should be changed.
Furthermore, the argument depends on the assumption that copper mining will slow down once copper can be chemically synthesized. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Moreover, it is entirely possible that copper mining will remain less expensive than copper synthesis. If so, there will be no incentives, outside of regulatory ones, to slow down copper mining. In a word, the problem of over-mining will remain.
Finally, the argument relies on the assumption that synthesizing copper will not create the same kind of pollution problems as those resulting from the synthesis of copper substitutes. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without such evidence, we cannot accept the premise that pollution problems will be eliminated by switching from producing copper substitutes to producing copper itself.in conclusion, I am not convinced on the basis of this argument that the time has come to cut funding for the regulation of mining in general, or even for the regulation of copper mining in particular. To strengthen the argument, the author must restrict the scope of the conclusion to copper mining rather than to mining in general. The author must also provide support for the two assumptions underlying the argument.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
20条地道实用英语句型(2)
2011年实用口语练习:今天你“团”了吗
节日英语口语:十一句话搞定圣诞礼物
实用英语:如何用英语砍价
2011年实用口语练习:一起来找“茶”
奥运会实用英语口语200句: 你可以乘火车去上海
疯狂口语要素精选 7
疯狂口语要素精选 13
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 偷得浮生半日闲ACT 3 - 1
2011年实用口语练习:歉意怎么说出口(2)
大学新生常用口语:熟悉校园和同学
新东方英语口语开口篇:打招呼(3)
地道口语:用21句表达沮丧
新东方英语口语开口篇:Age 年龄(4)
口语:“血肉之躯”用英语怎么说?
英文情景对话:我想吃真正的中国菜
英语流行语:你跟谁“合得来”?
英语口语主题:交际英语热门话题47个(21--生日派对)
实用口语情景轻松学:说一说旅行要准备的东西
实用口语情景轻松学:老外和菜农砍价时的地道英语对话
2011年实用口语练习:静观其变
地道英语口语:关于“apple”的英语俚语
口语情景对话:一个真正的斯图尔特家的后代ACT 1 - 3
实用口语:选举 Elections
疯狂口语要素精选 17
地道口语:职场必备的五个简单句子
2011年实用口语练习:背后捅刀
奥运会实用英语口语200句:这是一个非常受人欢迎的目的地
老外“精神不好”时会说些什么
2011年实用口语练习:In the library 在图书馆
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |