为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The author contends that it makes good sense to reduce funding for mining regulation, because regulatory problems with over-mining and pollution will be solved when scientists learn how to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements. One reason the author gives for this conclusion is that the problem of over-mining will be quickly eliminated when the amount of potentially available copper is no longer limited by the quantity of actual copper deposits. Another reason given is that pollution problems created by production of synthetic copper substitutes will be eliminated when manufacturers no longer depend on substitutes. This argument is weak because the conclusion goes beyond the scope of the premises and because the argument relies on questionable assumptions.
To begin with, the wording of the conclusion suggests that funding for mining regulation generally should be reduced, yet the premises are about copper mining only. There are many mined resources other than copper; advances in copper synthesis technology will in all likelihood have no bearing on whether regulation of other kinds of mining should be changed.
Furthermore, the argument depends on the assumption that copper mining will slow down once copper can be chemically synthesized. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Moreover, it is entirely possible that copper mining will remain less expensive than copper synthesis. If so, there will be no incentives, outside of regulatory ones, to slow down copper mining. In a word, the problem of over-mining will remain.
Finally, the argument relies on the assumption that synthesizing copper will not create the same kind of pollution problems as those resulting from the synthesis of copper substitutes. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without such evidence, we cannot accept the premise that pollution problems will be eliminated by switching from producing copper substitutes to producing copper itself.in conclusion, I am not convinced on the basis of this argument that the time has come to cut funding for the regulation of mining in general, or even for the regulation of copper mining in particular. To strengthen the argument, the author must restrict the scope of the conclusion to copper mining rather than to mining in general. The author must also provide support for the two assumptions underlying the argument.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
高考英语满分作文 Tomatoes(西红柿)
高考英语作文:幸福的家庭
高考英文写作务必提高“结构设计能力”
高考英语书面表达范文30套
高考英语满分作文 Advertisement-广告
2004年秋季高考 优秀高考英语作文
高考英语满分作文 Snakes(蛇)
高考英语满分作文 英语作文(Studying Abroad)
高考英语作文详解 议论文
高考英语满分作文 Water(水)
高考英语满分作文 不要浪费水资源
高考作文类型之通知notice
高中英语作文 Saving Our Earth(拯救地球)
高考英语满分作文 The EConomic Zone(海南经济特区)
高考英语满分作文:私家车越来越多
高考英语满分作文 Bamboo(竹子)
高考英语满分作文 谈谈写英语日记的好处
高考英语满分作文(2008年奥运会和我)
高考英语满分作文 公园要不要收门票?
高考英语作文范文:为什么学生们渴望上大学
2008年高考英语应对策略与基础写作指导
高考英语作文之日记写作指南
高考英语满分作文(幸福的家庭)
高考英语满分作文 Tiger(老虎)
高考英语满分作文 英语作文(乡村的秋天)
高考英语满分作文 Dogs(狗)
高考英语满分作文 Cactuses(仙人掌)
高考英语满分作文 英语作文(Good Manners)
高考英语满分作文 写邮件简述18岁成人宣誓仪式的感受
高中英语作文 Keeping Water Sources Clean(保持水源清洁)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |