为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The author contends that it makes good sense to reduce funding for mining regulation, because regulatory problems with over-mining and pollution will be solved when scientists learn how to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements. One reason the author gives for this conclusion is that the problem of over-mining will be quickly eliminated when the amount of potentially available copper is no longer limited by the quantity of actual copper deposits. Another reason given is that pollution problems created by production of synthetic copper substitutes will be eliminated when manufacturers no longer depend on substitutes. This argument is weak because the conclusion goes beyond the scope of the premises and because the argument relies on questionable assumptions.
To begin with, the wording of the conclusion suggests that funding for mining regulation generally should be reduced, yet the premises are about copper mining only. There are many mined resources other than copper; advances in copper synthesis technology will in all likelihood have no bearing on whether regulation of other kinds of mining should be changed.
Furthermore, the argument depends on the assumption that copper mining will slow down once copper can be chemically synthesized. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Moreover, it is entirely possible that copper mining will remain less expensive than copper synthesis. If so, there will be no incentives, outside of regulatory ones, to slow down copper mining. In a word, the problem of over-mining will remain.
Finally, the argument relies on the assumption that synthesizing copper will not create the same kind of pollution problems as those resulting from the synthesis of copper substitutes. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without such evidence, we cannot accept the premise that pollution problems will be eliminated by switching from producing copper substitutes to producing copper itself.in conclusion, I am not convinced on the basis of this argument that the time has come to cut funding for the regulation of mining in general, or even for the regulation of copper mining in particular. To strengthen the argument, the author must restrict the scope of the conclusion to copper mining rather than to mining in general. The author must also provide support for the two assumptions underlying the argument.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
中考英语满分作文欣赏
高考英语阅读素材:习近平庆丰包子 “主席套餐”
高考英语阅读素材:《百年孤独》作者马尔克斯逝世
高考英语阅读素材:英国好老板让员工上班看《权力的游戏》
高考英语阅读素材:现在就该养成的13个好习惯
高考英语阅读理解六字“真诀”
高考英语阅读素材:黑龙江K7034列车发生脱线事故 15名旅客受伤
高考英语阅读素材:李克强总理博鳌论坛主旨演讲
2015年高考英语阅读理解最新预测:资讯类
13区县中考英语用大纲卷
厦门市湖里中学七年级上册英语单元练习卷Unit 5--Unit 6
2015高考英语阅读理解命题分析与策略
高考英语阅读理解考什么:2015年高考题预测
高考双语阅读:上海乃穷乡僻壤?美剧对中国不乏歧视
新目标七年级英语单元检测题Starter Unit 1—Unit 3
高考双语阅读:美国骑车上班人数增加60%
高考英语阅读理解标准答案规律: 矩阵法则
高考英语阅读素材:你的极限在哪?开发你无限潜力的9个问题
2014高考英语阅读理解特训(5)
新目标英语七年级上册Unit 10知识点及小测试
高考英语阅读素材:先用护发素再用洗发水,你洗对了?
2015高考英语阅读理解高分技巧
新目标七年级英语单元测试unit3
高考双语阅读:《邻居大战》挤掉《蜘蛛侠2》 夺票房冠军
2006年北京中考英语试卷及答案
新目标七年级英语书面表达训练
2006年北京市海淀区初中毕业考试英语试卷及答案
新目标七上 Unit5 单元检测题
高考英语阅读素材:互联网时代10条规则 你真的会上网吗?
2006年北京中考英语试卷及答案
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |