为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
42. Scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that because scientists continually shift viewpoints about how our actions affect the natural environment, companies should not change their products and processes according to scientific recommendations until the government requires them to do so. This argument raises complex issues about the duties of business and about regulatory fairness and effectiveness. Although a wait-and-see policy may help companies avoid costly and unnecessary changes, three countervailing considerations compel me to disagree overall with the argument.
First, a regulatory system of environmental protection might not operate equitably. At first glance, a wait-and-see response might seem fair in that all companies would be subject to the same standards and same enforcement measures. However, enforcement requires detection, and while some violators may be caught, others might not. Moreover, a broad regulatory system imposes general standards that may not apply equitably to every company. Suppose, for example, that pollution from a company in a valley does more damage to the environment than similar pollution from a company on the coast. It would seem unfair to require the coastal company to invest as heavily in abatement or, in the extreme , to shut down the operation if the company cannot afford abatement measures.
Secondly, the argument assumes that the government regulations will properly reflect scientific recommendations. However, this claim is somewhat dubious. Companies with the most money and political influence, not the scientists, might in some cases dictate regulatory standards. In other words, legislators may be more influenced by political expediency and campaign pork than by societal concerns.
Thirdly, waiting until government regulations are in place can have disastrous effects on the environment. A great deal of environmental damage can occur before regulations are implemented. This problem is compounded whenever government reaction to scientific evidence is slow. Moreover, the EPA might be overburdened with its detection and enforcement duties, thereby allowing continued environmental damage by companies who have not yet been caught or who appeal penalties.
In conclusion, despite uncertainty within the scientific community about what environmental standards are best, companies should not wait for government regulation before reacting to warnings about environmental problems. The speakers recommended approach would in many cases operate inequitably among companies: moreover, it ignores the political-corruption factor as well as the potential environmental damage resulting from bureaucratic delay.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
雅思写作高分观点:控制人口增长是好举措吗?
雅思写作高分观点:年轻一代
雅思书信写作的技巧分享
三种雅思写作的词汇运用技巧
雅思写作高分观点:死刑能震慑罪犯吗?
雅思写作高手锦囊:常用段首句句型
雅思写作高分观点:广告在社会中扮演的角色
雅思写作高分观点:时装对社会的贡献
深度解析雅思写作的评分标准
快速提高雅思写作能力的5个练习要点
雅思小作文的备考误区介绍
雅思写作的4种写作方法介绍
雅思写作常用表达的同义词整理
雅思写作范文:21世纪的进步与挑战
如何展开雅思大作文的写作思路
雅思写作高分观点:禁烟问题
雅思写作高分观点:大城市生活好吗?
雅思写作范文:大学教育的学费
雅思写作9分范文:新建筑是否应该沿袭传统风貌
雅思写作开头段如何拿高分
雅思写作备考的六个关键点
雅思写作常见的审题误区介绍
雅思写作的十种失败开头介绍
雅思写作范文:如何看待空运水果蔬菜
雅思写作Task 1常用表达大全
雅思写作短期备考的方法
雅思写作高分观点:宠物是否有益于人
雅思写作范文:关于环境保护
雅思写作高分观点:父母的纵容会影响孩子的发展?
雅思写作高分观点:学生只应学习书本知识?
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |