为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
108. Employees should not have full access to their own personnel files. If, for example, employees were allowed to see certain confidential materials, the people supplying that information would not be likely to express their opinions candidly.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The issue is whether employees should have full access to their own personnel files. The speaker claims that they should not, pointing out that such access could diminish the condor of those supplying information. To some extent, I agree with this viewpoint. Although employees are entitled to be accurately informed about the substance of performance reviews or complaints in their files, at times there will be good reason not to identify information sources.
First of all, employers have a right to control some information pertinent to their business success. Unproductive or uncooperative workers can seriously harm an organization; for this reason, employers need to have accurate information about employee performance. But when employees have full access to their own personnel files, co-workers and even supervisors will often find it difficult to give frank criticism of underachievers or to report troublemakers. So although employees have legitimate claims to know what has been said about them, they are not always entitled to know who said it.
Secondly, employers are obligated to control some information when their employees are accursed of unlawful conduct. Since employers are responsible for wrongdoing at the workplace, they must investigate charges of, for example, drug activity, possession of firearms, or harassment. But again, without assurances of anonymity, accusers may be less forthright. Furthermore, they may be in jeopardy of retaliation by the accused. So while workers under investigation may be generally informed about complaints or reports, they should not know who filed them. Even so, employers do not enjoy an unlimited right to gather and keep confidential information about employees. For example, it would be unjust to investigate an employees political viewpoints, religious preference, or sexual orientation. Such invasions of privacy are not warranted by an employers right to performance-related information, or duty to protect the workplace from criminal wrongdoing.
In conclusion, limiting employee access to personnel files is sometimes warranted to encourage candor and prevent retaliation against information sources. At the same time, employers have no right to solicit or secure information about the private lives of their workers.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
长沙市推出1300亿美元刺激计划
美国家庭
关于时间的英语名人名言
苹果和Facebook给投资者的启示
英语美文 I Love You, Mom
当心,电子书也在“读”你
哥哥的心愿
读钱钟书的三封英文信(三)
Magical coat
亡羊补牢,尤未迟也
什么是成功What's success
Lex专栏:铁矿石价格决定力拓兴衰
坚持你的梦想
一本好书一个最好的朋友
于不完美中求得人生的完整
有关母爱的英语格言
联想:成为PC老大后未来仍不确定
京东商城开通英文网站 开拓西方市场
最美丽的心
像无人观望一样纵情地起舞
企业价值观不能计算
一个小时的故事
One Finger 一个手指
伊拉克各地袭击造成91人死亡
美国豪宅开发商讨好中国购房者
Lex专栏:百度与中国搜索市场
三颗核桃
How Should One Read a Book? 应该怎样读书
Picasso And Me 毕加索和我
黑客公布一批苹果移动设备用户数据
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |