为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
59. The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine.
Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable allday child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This editorial argues that, since career advancement for scientists typically requires 60 to 80 hours of work per week, affordable all-day child care must be made available to scientists of both genders if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, the editorial urges that requirements for career advancement be made more flexible to insure that pre-school children can spend a significant amount of time each day with a parent. This argument is problematic in two crucial respects.
The major problem with the view expressed in the article is that inconsistent recommendations are endorsed in the argument. On the one hand, scientists are urged to put their children in all-day child-care facilities in order to advance their careers. On the other hand, they are encouraged to spend a significant amount of time each day with their children. Obviously, scientists cannot be expected to adhere to both of these recommendations.
Another problem is that the recommendations are based on the assumption that all, or at least most, scientists have young or preschool-age children. But the editorial provides no evidence to support this assumption, nor is this assumption very likely to be true. Since, childless scientists or scientists whose children are old enough to take care of themselves will have no need for the services advocated in this article, it is doubtful that these recommendations will receive much widespread support.
In conclusion, this argument is unconvincing. To strengthen it, the author must show that most scientists have preschool children and consequently are in need of the recommended services. Additionally, the author must address and resolve the apparent conflict between the recommendations.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
伊索寓言:狼与小羊(双语)
幼儿英语Flash小故事(18)
《格林童话》(中英)
幼儿英语Flash小故事(11)
汤玛士小火车 第6季:有趣的朋友们16
《格林童话》(中英)
《蓝皮童话书》之The History Of Jack The Giant-killer
安徒生童话之欢乐家庭
汤玛士小火车 第6季:有趣的朋友们26
幼儿英语小故事(7)
安徒生童话之影子
伊索寓言:狐狸和葡萄(双语)
安徒生童话:THE BELL
汤玛士小火车 第6季:有趣的朋友们25
伊索寓言:驴和买驴的人(双语)
伊索寓言:雌狐与母狮(双语)
《蓝皮童话书》之A Voyage To Lilliput
《蓝皮童话书》之Toads And Diamonds
安徒生童话之淘气的男孩
幼儿英语Flash小故事(14)
安徒生童话之皇帝的新衣
伊索寓言:老人与死神(双语)
伊索寓言:狐狸和山羊(双语)
伊索寓言:披着羊皮的狼(双语)
《蓝皮童话书》之Blue Beard
伊索寓言:狼与鹭鸶(双语)
伊索寓言:蝙蝠、鸟和野兽(双语)
伊索寓言:披着狮皮的驴(双语)
伊索寓言:披着狮皮的驴(双语)
伊索寓言:老鼠开会(双语)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |