为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
59. The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine.
Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable allday child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This editorial argues that, since career advancement for scientists typically requires 60 to 80 hours of work per week, affordable all-day child care must be made available to scientists of both genders if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, the editorial urges that requirements for career advancement be made more flexible to insure that pre-school children can spend a significant amount of time each day with a parent. This argument is problematic in two crucial respects.
The major problem with the view expressed in the article is that inconsistent recommendations are endorsed in the argument. On the one hand, scientists are urged to put their children in all-day child-care facilities in order to advance their careers. On the other hand, they are encouraged to spend a significant amount of time each day with their children. Obviously, scientists cannot be expected to adhere to both of these recommendations.
Another problem is that the recommendations are based on the assumption that all, or at least most, scientists have young or preschool-age children. But the editorial provides no evidence to support this assumption, nor is this assumption very likely to be true. Since, childless scientists or scientists whose children are old enough to take care of themselves will have no need for the services advocated in this article, it is doubtful that these recommendations will receive much widespread support.
In conclusion, this argument is unconvincing. To strengthen it, the author must show that most scientists have preschool children and consequently are in need of the recommended services. Additionally, the author must address and resolve the apparent conflict between the recommendations.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
雅思阅读:考试过程中需要特别留意的地方
雅思阅读:判断类题型解题技巧
雅思阅读:综合技能指导(Part II)
粗谈雅思阅读的基本 复习思路
雅思阅读:如何准备考试之话题篇
雅思阅读:考试:“笔”是最得力的工具
雅思阅读:围绕题型怎样备考
雅思阅读:如何突破词汇大关
雅思阅读:怎样对付文中的生词问题
3-6 月雅思阅读综合技能指导
雅思阅读:句子结构
王辉: 雅思阅读考试真题词汇收集
雅思阅读:如何合理安排考试
雅思阅读:如何准备考试之话题篇
雅思阅读:综合技能指导(Part I)
雅思阅读:6-7分答题策略及操作流程演示
雅思阅读:题型归纳Summary (Part 4)
雅思阅读:考试现场的应试策略
名师指导: 雅思阅读部分最基本复习思路
做好英语考试英译汉题目
张文婷: 谈谈阅读基本技能
雅思阅读:考试Heading题目特点分析
阅读关键:归纳、 总结、定位 听力:量体裁衣
如何突破6分----阅读篇
雅思阅读:考试现场的应试策略
雅思阅读:题型背后测试,阅读技能
雅思阅读考试高分 “必杀技”
雅思阅读:审题与关键词
揭秘:《阿凡达》 纳美人外星语言诞生之谜
雅思阅读:误区
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |