为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
41. The following appeared as part of an article in a trade publication.
Stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being copied and sold by imitators. With such protection, manufacturers will naturally invest in the development of new home-security products and production technologies. Without stronger laws, therefore, manufacturers will cut back on investment. From this will follow a corresponding decline not only in product quality and marketability, but also in production efficiency, and thus ultimately a loss of manufacturing jobs in the industry.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The author of this article warns that stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home security systems from being copied and sold by imitators in order to prevent an eventual loss of manufacturing jobs within the industry. This conclusion is based on the following chain of reasoning: With the protection of stronger laws, manufacturers will naturally invest in the development of new home security products and production technologies, whereas without such protection, manufacturers will cut back on investment. If manufacturers cut back on investment, then a decline in product quality and marketability, as well as in production efficiency, will result. This, in turn, will cause the predicted loss of industry jobs. This line of reasoning is unconvincing for several reasons.
To begin with, the author assumes that existing copyright, patent and trade secret laws are inadequate to protect home security system design. But the author never explains why these laws dont offer sufficient protection, nor does he offer any evidence to show that this is the case.
Secondly, the argument depends on the twin assumptions that stronger legal protection will encourage manufacturers to invest in home security-system production, while the absence of strong legal protection will have the opposite effect. The author fails to provide any evidence or reasons for accepting these assumptions about cause-and-effect connections between the law and what happens in the marketplace.
Moreover, both of these assumptions can be challenged. It is possible that stronger protections would not greatly affect industry investment or jobs overall, but would instead help to determine which companies invested heavily and, therefore, provided the jobs. For instance, a less-restricted market might foster investment and competition among smaller companies, whereas stronger legal protections might encourage market domination by fewer, larger companies.
In conclusion, I do not find this argument compelling. The author must provide evidence that home security system designs are not being adequately protected by current patent, copyright or trade secret laws. The author must also provide an argument for the assumptions that stronger laws will create more industry jobs overall, while the absence of stronger laws will result in fewer industry jobs.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
GRE数学考试专项内容介绍
GRE数学:几何知识考查重点
GRE考试数学词汇记忆:G H
GRE数学题目分析:无选项计算题+多项选择题+判断题
GRE数学例题:数据解释题型(10)
GRE数学图表题两招攻克
GRE考试数学词汇记忆:P类
GRE数学词汇:分数 小数
GRE数学考试常用术语总结
GRE数学多少分算高分?
GRE数学12个方面全面复习
GRE数学中常见问题解决方法
GRE数学陷阱巧躲避
GRE数学题解题方法归纳
GRE数学考试十个易错题
GRE考试数学词汇记忆(T-V类)
GRE数学:备考方法+注意事项
GRE数学冲刺聚焦难点+解决对策
GRE数学考点:Dividing Polynomial by Monomial
GRE数学例题解析:统计学
GRE考试数学词汇记忆:S类
GRE数学考试考点分析:概率
GRE考试数学词汇记忆:I
GRE数学:基本概念+实例解析(1)
GRE数学词汇大全:分数和小数
GRE考试数学词汇记忆:E
GRE数学考试问题与对策
GRE数学题应回答方式介绍
GRE数学考点:Factoring(x2-y2)
GRE数学考试常用公式大全
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |