It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
I agree with the speaker that it is sometimes necessary, and even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. A contrary view would reveal a naivetd about the inherent nature of public politics, and about the sorts of compromises on the part of well-intentioned political leaders necessary in order to further the publics ultmaate interests. Nevertheless, we must not allow our political leaders undue freedom to with-hold information, otherwise, we risk sanctioning demagoguery and undermining the philosophical underpinnings of any democratic society.
One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker is that in order to gain the opportunity for effective public leadership, a would-be leader must fzrst gain and maintain political power. In the game of politics, complete forthrightness is a sign of vulnerability and naivete, neither of which earn a politician respect among his or her opponents, and which those opponents will use to every advantage to defeat the politician. In my observation some measure of pandering to the electorate is necessary to gain and maintain political leadership. For example, were all politicians to fully disclose every personal foibles, character flaw, and detail concerning personal life, few honest politicians would ever by elected. While this view might seem cynical, personal scandals have in fact proven the undoing of many a political career; thus I think this view is realistic.
Another reason why I essentially agree with the speaker is that fully disclosing to the public certain types of information would threaten public safety and perhaps even national security. For example, if the President were to disclose the governments strategies for thwarting specific plans of an international terrorist or a drug trafficker, those strategies would surely fail, and the publics health and safety would be compromised as a result. Withholding information might also be necessary to avoid public panic. While such cases are rare, they do occur
occasionally. For example, during the first few hours of the new millennium the U.S. Pentagons missile defense system experienced a Y2K- related malfunction. This fact was withheld from the public until later in the day, once the problem had been solved; and legitimately so, since immediate disclosure would have served no useful purpose and might even have resulted in mass hysteria.
Having recognized that withholding informarion from the public is often necessary to serve the interests of that public, legitimate political leadership nevertheless requires forthrightness with the citizenry as to the leaders motives and agenda. History informs us that would-be leaders who lack such forthrightness are the same ones who seize and maintain power either by brute force or by demagoguery--that is, by deceiving and manipulating the citizenry. Paragons such as Genghis Khan and Hitler, respectively, come immediately to mind. Any democratic society should of course abhor demagoguery, which operates against the democratic principle of government by the people. Consider also less egregious examples, such as President Nixons withholding of information about his active role in the Watergate cover-up. His behavior demonstrated a concern for self- interest above the broader interests of the democratic system that granted his political authority in the first place.
In sum, the game of politics calls for a certain amount of disingenuousness and lack of forthrightness that we might otherwise characterize as dishonesty. And such behavior is a necessary means to the final objective of effective political leadership. Nevertheless, in any democracy a leader who relies chiefly on deception and secrecy to preserve that leadership, to advance a private agenda, or to conceal selfish motives, betrays the democracy-and ends up forfeiting the polirical game.
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第四章:负担 第1节
语言学:英语知多少之语法概述
英文名著精选阅读:《理智与情感》第五章 第4节
英文名著精选阅读:《红字》第十五章(下)
英文欣赏:青春物语 Man's Youth
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第四章 第3节
英文名著精选阅读:《理智与情感》第一章 第3节
英文名著精选阅读:《红字》第十一章(上)
海外文化:中国2010年海外并购潮热度不减
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第七章 第3节
精选英语美文阅读:别错过机会
精选英语美文阅读:水下观弄潮
语言学:英语知多少之英语时态(3)
英文名著精选阅读:《理智与情感》第二章 第2节
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第二章:圣诞快乐 第14节
2011诺贝尔奖:科学家的幽默让你HOLD不住
【我爱卡路里】万圣节特供:南瓜派!
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第三十八章
英文名著精选阅读:《红字》第十三章(下)
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第八章 第3节
双语:“大脚”问题日益困扰英国女性
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第一章:朝圣 第11节
双语:复活节风俗大揭秘
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第三章:劳伦斯家的男孩 第12节
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第三章:劳伦斯家的男孩 第7节
英文名著精选阅读:《理智与情感》第一章 第2节
英文名著精选阅读:《红字》第五章(上)
英文名著精选阅读:《红字》第十三章(上)
精选双语阅读: Eight April Fools' Day Pranks
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第三十六章
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |