The Analytical Writing section of the GRE revised General Test consists of two separately timed analytical writing tasks:
1.An Analyze an Issue task
2.An Analyze an Argument task
Analyze An Issue Task
The Analyze an Issue task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each issue statement makes a claim that you can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. The issue statement is followed by a set of specific instructions. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
2.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
3.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
4.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
5.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
6.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Analyze An Argument Task
The Analyze an Argument task assesses your ability to understand, analyze and evaluate arguments and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing. You are presented with a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence. Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the authors case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and the use of evidence. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2.Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
4.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
5.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
6.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
7.Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
双语阅读:奥巴马打扮成圣诞老人!为医院儿童分发礼物
体坛英语资讯:Beijing Guoan lifts 2018 CFA Cup trophy with away goals advantage
Everybody Has Talent 人人都有才华
体坛英语资讯:Israel stun Serbia 83-74 to stay alive for China 2019 FIBA World Cup
体坛英语资讯:German legend Kahn suing goalkeeper gloves manufacturer
国内英语资讯: China unveils annual patent award
双语阅读:只有少数人能坚持运动,科学家的话让我惊呆了
双语阅读:2019年要来了 有哪些事情值得期待?
国内英语资讯:China consults public opinion on draft foreign investment law
双语阅读:星巴克在中国又遇强敌,这家可能比瑞幸还猛
体坛英语资讯:Two Chinese snooker players banned for match-fixing
无印良品开始造无人驾驶公交车了
体坛英语资讯: Fluminense sack coach Oliveira
国内英语资讯:China supports positive interaction between DPRK, ROK: FM spokesperson
国际英语资讯:Trump adviser says jobs of Fed chair, treasury secretary safe
国内英语资讯:Over 100 new China-developed medicines certified
为什么你只对特定人群具有吸引力?
国内英语资讯:CPC meeting underlines core status of Xi
明年穿什么衣服最潮?提前解码2019五大流行服饰
贝克汉姆夫妇一年能挣多少?数字就惊呆我了....
体坛英语资讯:Dortmunds new hero ready for the Champions League
国内英语资讯: Reform and opening-up sees market entity surge in China
体坛英语资讯:Neymar, Mbappe to start for PSG in crucial Champions League clash
体坛英语资讯:The Philippines lose to Kazakhstan in FIBA World Cup qualifier
赛琳娜康复首次亮相,元气满满!
体坛英语资讯: Selby, Liang crash out of UK Snooker Championship
国内英语资讯: Chinas wheelchair-bound writer re-elected as chairperson of Rehabilitation International
双语阅读:想在事业上更成功?养只宠物吧!
体坛英语资讯:PSG beat Liverpool, keep knockout qualification alive in Champions League
你收到过哪些奇葩圣诞礼物?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |