In his own lifetime Galileo was the centre of violent controversy;but the scientific dust has long since settled, and today we can see even hisfamous clash with the Inquisition in something like its proper perspective.But, in contrast, it is only in modern times that Galileo has become a problemchild for historians of science.
The old view of Galileo was delightfully uncomplicated. He was,above all, a man who experimented: who despised the prejudices and booklearning of the Aristotelians, who put his questions to nature instead of tothe ancients, and who drew his conclusions fearlessly. He had been the first toturn a telescope to the sky, and he had seen there evidence enough to overthrowAristotle and Ptolemy together. He was the man who climbed the Leaning Tower ofPisa and dropped various weights from the top, who rolled balls down inclinedplanes, and then generalized the results of his many experiments into thefamous law of free fall.
But a closer study of the evidence, supported by a deeper sense ofthe period, and particularly by a new consciousness of the philosophicalundercurrents in the scientific revolution, has profoundly modified this viewof Galileo. Today, although the old Galileo lives on in many popular writings,among historians of science a new and more sophisticated picture has emerged.At the same time our sympathy for Galileos opponents has grown somewhat. His telescopicobservations are justly immortal; they aroused great interest at the time, theyhad important theoretical consequences, and they provided a strikingdemonstration of the potentialities hidden in instruments and apparatus. Butcan we blame those who looked and failed to see what Galileo saw, if weremember that to use a telescope at the limit of its powers calls for longexperience and intimate familiarity with ones instrument? Was the philosopherwho refused to look through Galileos telescope more culpable than those whoalleged that the spiral nebulae observed with Lord Rosses great telescope inthe eighteen-forties were scratches left by the grinder? We can perhaps forgivethose who said the moons of Jupiter were produced by Galileos spyglass if werecall that in his day, as for centuries before, curved glass was the popularcontrivance for producing not truth but illusion, untruth; and if a singlecurved glass would distort nature, how much more would a pair of them?
上一篇: 写作精选例句 (21)
下一篇: 写作精选例句 (19)
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 22 Leaving and Arriving》flash课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 17 Beijing is Great》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 19 May I Invite Danny and Jenny》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《Lesson 3 What Do They Look Like》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 6 Having Fun Together》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 21 How Can We Go To Beijing》flash课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 21 How Can We Go To Beijing》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 2《lesson 16 again, please》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 18 May I Go to Beijing》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 5 What do they like to do》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 7 are you ready for a quiz》flash课件之二
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《Lesson 1 Fathers Mothers Brothers and Sisters》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《Lesson 2 Aunts, Uncles》ppt课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 8 Again, please》flash课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 4《lesson 26 Li Ming’s Favorite Clothes》flash课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 2《lesson 14 Australia》flash课件包(2课时)
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 20 How Far is Beijing》ppt课件包(含教案及说课稿)
冀教版五年级上Unit 4《lesson 25 what do we need for the trip》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 24 Again, please》ppt课件包(含声音素材)
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 20 How Far is Beijing》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 4 Do They Work》ppt课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 6 Having Fun Together》flash课件包(2课时)
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 22 Leaving and Arriving》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 2《lesson 13 The U.K.》ppt课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 4《lesson 28 Where is it》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 4 Do They Work》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 21 How Can We Go To Beijing》flash课件之二
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 5 What do they like to do》ppt课件之一
冀教版五年级上Unit 3《lesson 21 How Can We Go To Beijing》flash课件
冀教版五年级上Unit 1《lesson 8 Again, please》flash课件