For the last 82years, Swedens Nobel Academy has decided who will receive the Nobel Prize in Literature, thereby determining who will be elevated from the great and the near great to the immortal. But today the Academy is coming under heavy criticism both from the without and from within. Critics contend that the selection of the winners often has less to do with true writing ability than with the peculiar internal politics of the Academy and of Sweden itself. According to Ingmar Bjorksten, the cultural editor for one of the countrys two major newspapers, the prize continues to represent what people call a very Swedish exercise: reflecting Swedish tastes.
The Academy has defended itself against such charges of provincialism in its selection by asserting that its physical distance from the great literary capitals of the world actually serves to protect the Academy from outside influences. This may well be true, but critics respond that this very distance may also be responsible for the Academys inability to perceive accurately authentic trends in the literary world.
Regardless of concerns over the selection process, however, it seems that the prize will continue to survive both as an indicator of the literature that we most highly praise, and as an elusive goal that writers seek. If for no other reason, the prize will continue to be desirable for the financial rewards that accompany it; not only is the cash prize itself considerable, but it also dramatically increases sales of an authors books.
英国一所中学禁止女生穿裙子 称不够淑女
国内英语资讯:Chinese vice president calls for building stronger cultural confidence
体坛英语资讯:Flamengo playmaker Arrascaeta backs Balotelli bid
母乳喂养的孩子智商更高
怎样让你的照片更美
北极融化可能耗费全球60万亿美元
体坛英语资讯:PAOK draw Ajax 2-2 in UEFA Champions League qualification
体坛英语资讯:Ex-German football officials charged in 2006 World Cup fraud probe
宠物龟假扮汉堡 男子欲混过安检
游客挤爆中国死海 密密麻麻全是人