The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure afair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
疯狂口语要素精选 13
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 二度蜜月ACT 3 - 2
2011年实用口语练习:In the library 在图书馆
2011年实用口语练习:今天你“团”了吗
实用口语情景轻松学:Take baby steps 慢慢来
实用口语情景轻松学:老外和菜农砍价时的地道英语对话
新东方英语口语开口篇:Age 年龄(4)
2011年实用口语练习:一起来找“茶”
新东方英语口语开口篇:描述外貌(3)
大学新生常用口语:熟悉校园和同学
日常口语精华集1
实用口语:Nicole's day at school
疯狂口语要素精选 6
20条地道实用英语句型(2)
实用英语口语要素精选24
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 没问题ACT 2 - 1
实用口语:选举 Elections
那些美剧告诉你的事儿
奥运会实用英语口语200句:这是一个非常受人欢迎的目的地
美国生活必备口语:租房英语大全(1)
2011年实用口语练习:Arrival 入学报到啦
实用口语情景轻松学:飞机事故真是太惨了
疯狂口语要素精选 7
最常用的26句生活用语
2011年实用口语练习:静观其变
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 当仁不让 ACT 3 - 1
实用英语:如何用英语砍价
2011年实用口语练习:这只是“权宜之计”
实用口语情景轻松学:求职面试
2011年实用口语练习:背后捅刀
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |