The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure afair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
中国网友占领奥巴马Google+ 戏称推广汉语人人有责
传Facebook来华招聘:提供高薪股份和绿卡
唯冠诉苹果侵权案上海开庭 iPad或遭禁售
保持家庭幸福的真理
职场双语:八个被遗忘的求职秘诀
世界上最离谱的结婚对象
如何管理好自己?
乌镇:江南水乡的诗意生活
公司内部窝里斗值不值得提倡?
今天乔布斯生日:活着就是为了改变世界
高效率人生必须杜绝的十件事
智能广告牌现身伦敦:广告只给女人看
1/3男性愿意和不爱的女人走进婚姻围墙
凤姐看不上林书豪 因为林书豪不够帅
科学家发现爱情功效堪比毒品
2017NBA全明星赛西部险胜东部队 杜兰特荣膺MVP
奥斯卡颁奖礼面临收视滑坡
社交网站社交功能减弱 用户隐私设置加强
林书豪只是中国人借来的英雄
中国建筑师王澍获普利兹克奖
第32届金酸莓奖提名揭晓
英国将为外来人口免费治疗艾滋病
巴黎获评最佳大学城市 伦敦全球第二
少女拒绝求爱遭毁容 凶手被指官二代引爆谴责
手纸筒里的无限创意
雨水节气养生:中医学调理脾胃,不易吃太油腻
立即恢复体能的6种方法
巴菲特公开信认错 股神误判楼市错得离谱
你是一个成功者吗?
纽约时报评选年度汉字 “管”字界定中国社会
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |