The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure afair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
SAT写作范例:Is Business Undergraduate Major justified?
SAT作文素材分享(二):Informational social influence
SAT作文范例 Catherine Drew Gilpin Faust
SAT作文题目分类:真话假话类
SAT作文范文:World be better?
SAT官方满分范文之technology
关于SAT写作题目的四点启发 全英文
SAT作文范文:Risk and Change
SAT写作素材之孔子
SAT常用词汇:Basic Human Emotions
SAT常用写作素材之Aristotle
SAT优秀作文的小技巧
创新类常见SAT作文题目
SAT作文素材名人类:Audrey Hepburn
SAT作文练习题目分享
一篇SAT作文点评
SAT写作评分标准之连字符号
SAT作文例子一定要鲜活
SAT Essay范文分享
SAT写作6分范文之creativity in our world
SAT作文范文:Reality television programs
SAT写作题目讨论:popular culture
SAT满分作文about hero
2014年5月SAT考试作文真题
SAT写作辅导书PRINCETON REVIEW系列详解
SAT作文模板是把双刃剑
SAT作文素材:Eleanor Roosevelt
看看美国高考作文都考啥
sat作文例子总结
SAT作文素材:科学、文学、历史类
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |