The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure a
fair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
为什么菲律宾总统杜特尔特不信任美国
美国袭击也门目标报复导弹袭击
联邦调查局调查克林顿竞选负责人电邮被黑事件
国内英语资讯:Interview: Cambodian politicians, scholars hail Chinese President Xis signed article on Si
哥伦比亚总统延长与反政府武装的停火
它可能是世上最惨的大熊猫 吃垃圾没人管 心酸
A Post Card from John
真正的“外婆家”:餐厅聘用来自世界各地的奶奶们做厨师
有什么行之有效的学习习惯?
国际英语资讯:Gene editing offers hope for curing sickle cell anemia
2017考研:英语高频短语(34)
双语阅读之精彩人生的11个快乐秘诀
国际英语资讯:Suspected U.S.-led air strike kills 15 civilians in Syrias al-Raqqa
国内英语资讯:Macao people can make the city a better place: Premier Li
国内英语资讯:Chinese president, Papua New Guinea governor-general exchange congratulations on anniversary
My family
Tom’s Holiday
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Premier Li wraps up Macao visit, announces support measures
联合国即将任命新秘书长
不用App自带滤镜 也能调出更赞的照片
国内英语资讯:Xiangshan Forum reaches consensus on maritime security
从航拍角度看这些知名城市
国内英语资讯:Full text of Chinese presidents signed article in Cambodian newspaper
2017考研:英语高频短语(33)
My family
权力的游戏:强者都具备这11点特质
国际英语资讯:Vitamin treatment unlocks door to stem cell therapies: New Zealand scientist
A Farewell Party
叙利亚停火前景渺茫,避免冲突扩大化成为关注焦点
葡萄牙前总理古特雷斯 成下任联合国秘书长
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |