The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure a
fair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
为什么数字13在西方不吉利?(图)
风靡印度的"水中瑜伽" 想不想试试功效呢?
海外文化美国人的个性
英国育儿账单大曝光(图)
异域采风:英国的下午茶和6点茶
悠然闲适尽在下午茶:下午茶的来历
是谁最早成立的啦啦队
"南瓜节"来狂欢:恶作剧还是招待?
欧洲饮酒调查:英国人酒量最大(图)
咖啡文化:了解咖啡豆命名的依据
值得中国孩子学习的美国孩子的四大优点
巴黎:"女人不得穿裤子"禁令有望废除
欧美文化:谁是"山姆大叔"?
丁克家庭之后的奈特尔家庭
大千世界:全球最恐怖的10个古堡(双语组图)
29岁美女当选英国最年轻市长(图)
芝加哥的别名,你知道多少?
全球最动听的英文花名(图)
美利坚搞笑十大怪
咖啡文化:爱尔兰咖啡(Cafe Irish)的命名故事
菲利普亲王的搞笑语录
英国父母担心孩子安全 日益看紧孩子
欧美文化:美国国旗的意义
你知道喝酒为什么要碰杯吗?
让人又敬又怕的神秘女巫
纽约的十大绰号,你知道几个?
海外文化:传说中的吸血鬼真的存在么?
入乡随俗必须知道的五个禁忌
海外文化:关于《圣经》的十大误解(双语组图)
念到你抓狂的英语绕口令
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |