The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure a
fair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
《同桌的你》:初恋往往敌不过现实
《功夫熊猫3》重返江湖背后的故事
疯了的世界里,如何找到属于你的平静
最基本的奥运会相关规定科普
《为奴二十年》:横扫各大颁奖典礼的秘密
70年漫长时光也无法改变的浪漫回忆
拳王阿里眼中的自己:我依旧是“最伟大的”
排球运动:受篮球运动启发的新发明
关于色彩心理学的那些小事
奥普拉,不只是脱口秀的女王
《冰雪奇缘》:在老套情节中颠覆传统
双语美文:今天,你戒掉抱怨了吗?
网球运动;寺院和尚的发明?
双语美文:也许放手才是永恒
乒乓球辉夜球迷不得不知的大小事盘点
《美国骗局》:电影背后的真实故事
《白日焰火》:兼具文艺与商业的黑色电影
永远的世界天王迈克尔杰克逊:人虽远去而余响永存
哥本哈根:一个比安迪生童话更令人着迷的地方
性格内向者所遭受的十大误解
黎巴嫩文坛骄子卡里·纪伯伦:当爱向你们挥手
巴黎:世人眼中毋庸置疑的浪漫之都
斯诺克台球用球揭秘,斯诺克台球用什么球比赛
奥运知识科普:奥运休战传统始于何时
奥运会知识科普:运动员宣誓与官方宣誓
奥运会知识科普:奥运会会旗与圣火的含义
双语美文:学着做个碱性人
网球运动历史解密:网球运动的前世今生
中美关系的友好使者:乒乓球
盘点潜在的抑郁症患者常做的那些事
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |