BEIJING, Aug. 8 -- China's top securities regulator said Saturday that resolving issues of common concern through dialogue is the only way to achieve win-win results, when responding to a recent U.S. report released by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets.
The so-called "Report on Protecting United States Investors from Significant Risks from Chinese Companies" has recommendations such as enhancing listing standards on U.S. exchanges for access to audit work papers.
Strengthening the supervision of listed companies' information disclosure and improving auditors' professional ethics and their practices are important means to protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) said on its website.
Starting from common interests of both sides, China and the United States should carry out open dialogue and cooperation, it said.
The two sides have maintained communication and interaction, the CSRC said, adding that Chinese authorities have shown full cooperation sincerity by repeatedly communicating with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on joint inspections of accounting firms since 2019.
On Aug. 4, the Chinese side sent updated proposals concerning the joint inspections to the PCAOB based on the latest needs and ideas of the U.S. side, it said.
"Resolving issues of common concern through dialogue is the only way to achieve win-win results," said the CSRC. "Only by doing so can a sound environment for the healthy and orderly operation of the global capital market be created."
China has never prohibited or prevented relevant accounting firms from offering audit work papers to overseas regulators, the CSRC said.
The country's securities authorities have provided the audit work papers of several U.S.-listed Chinese companies to the U.S. securities authorities, as mentioned in the U.S. report, it said.
The exchange of information including that of audit work papers should be conducted through regulatory cooperation channels, which is an internationally accepted common practice, the CSRC said.
第一次GMAT 750,第二次GMAT 760
GMAT3战750分享心得
2013年GMAT综合推理部分常见问题
GMAT考试1-GMAT数学12月总结(一)
GMAT:Integrated Reasoning (IR)解析
GMAT730写作满分大牛的经验分享
GMAT考试1-GMAT数学12月总结(三)
新GMAT综合推理(IR)备考内容解析
GMAT考试1-GMAT数学12月总结(十二)
GMAT一战770分:我们的未来不是梦
GMAT综合推理四大题型形式解析
GMAT写作5升6的经验分享
GMAT综合推理部分的重要性
GMAT再战如何面对
GMAT考试数学辅导11月数学总结(四)
GMAT考试1-GMAT数学12月总结(九)
GMAT综合推理 题型总结
31天GMAT 770 + 5.5
新版GMAT 增综合推理,取消论说文
GMAT二战750
GMAT裸考770:关键是找感觉
斯坦福大学对IR的说明
在职考生GMAT 720分心得体会
GMAT考试数学辅导04年1月数学总结(三)
GMAT综合推理(IR)备考内容解析
GMAT阅读高分经验分享
曼哈顿对综合推理的评价
浅析GMAT非形式逻辑解题
GMAT考试数学辅导04年1月数学总结(一)
听课笔记
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |