MOSCOW, June 19 -- The so-called "Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020" is an attempt by the United States to infringe on China's sovereignty and cannot be considered otherwise than an unacceptable interference in China's internal affairs, a Russian scholar said Friday.
"The United States sees China as its main geopolitical competitor and has long and consistently pursued a policy of containing China," Andrei Manoilo, a professor of political science at Moscow State University, said in an interview with Xinhua.
Washington is exhausting every means, from economic restrictions and sanctions to outright interference in China's internal affairs, like what it has done in the violent events in Hong Kong and Tibet, as well as the signing of the so-called act, Manoilo said.
Terrorist organizations operating in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region have links with international terrorist network structures, and sometimes are branches or cells of international terrorist organizations, representing a serious threat to the national security, Manoilo said.
In recent years, he recalled, China has made considerable progress in preventing terrorist and extremist crimes and stabilizing the situation, with terrorist attacks in Xinjiang virtually ceasing.
"But this does not suit certain forces in the United States, which are trying to reheat ethnic and religious conflicts and destabilize the situation under the pretext of protecting the rights of the Uygur ethnic group," Manoilo said.
While China is effectively fighting terrorism and extremism, the United States is trying to smear these anti-terrorism and preventive measures as massive violations of human rights, he concluded.
On Thursday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the Chinese government and people express strong indignation at and firm opposition to the signing of the so-called "Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020" by the United States.
This so-called act deliberately denigrated the human rights conditions in China's Xinjiang, viciously attacked the Chinese government's Xinjiang policy, blatantly violated international law and basic norms governing international relations, and grossly interfered in China's internal affairs, the ministry said.
2016届浙江苍南高考英语二轮复习完形填空训练(4)
2016届辽宁盘锦高考英语二轮复习短文语法填空选编(1)
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(2)
2016届山东即墨高考英语二轮复习完形填空能力练习(5)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题12 情景交际
2016届辽宁盘锦高考英语二轮复习短文语法填空选编(4)
2016届湖北丹江口高考英语二轮复习完形填空精编(5)
2016届山东即墨高考英语二轮复习完形填空能力练习(1)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题14 阅读理解(命题类型探讨)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题3 形容词和副词
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题4 动词和动词词组
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题5 动词的时态和语态
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题2 代词和介词
2016届湖南湘乡高考英语二轮复习短文改错精编(1)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题8 定语从句
2016届浙江苍南高考英语二轮复习完形填空训练(3)
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(4)
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(5)
2016届辽宁盘锦高考英语二轮复习短文语法填空选编(3)
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(3)
2016届辽宁盘锦高考英语二轮复习短文语法填空选编(2)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题16 短文改错、语法填空和阅读填空
2016届湖南湘乡高考英语二轮复习短文改错精编(3)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题6 非谓语动词
2016届浙江苍南高考英语二轮复习完形填空训练(1)
2016届湖北丹江口高考英语二轮复习完形填空精编(3)
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题9 名词性从句
2016届高考英语二轮专题热点集训:专题15 阅读理解(语篇话题探讨)
2016届山西长治高考英语二轮复习阅读理解精练(1)
2016届四川青神高考英语二轮复习阅读理解选练(2)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |