MOSCOW, June 19 -- The so-called "Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020" is an attempt by the United States to infringe on China's sovereignty and cannot be considered otherwise than an unacceptable interference in China's internal affairs, a Russian scholar said Friday.
"The United States sees China as its main geopolitical competitor and has long and consistently pursued a policy of containing China," Andrei Manoilo, a professor of political science at Moscow State University, said in an interview with Xinhua.
Washington is exhausting every means, from economic restrictions and sanctions to outright interference in China's internal affairs, like what it has done in the violent events in Hong Kong and Tibet, as well as the signing of the so-called act, Manoilo said.
Terrorist organizations operating in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region have links with international terrorist network structures, and sometimes are branches or cells of international terrorist organizations, representing a serious threat to the national security, Manoilo said.
In recent years, he recalled, China has made considerable progress in preventing terrorist and extremist crimes and stabilizing the situation, with terrorist attacks in Xinjiang virtually ceasing.
"But this does not suit certain forces in the United States, which are trying to reheat ethnic and religious conflicts and destabilize the situation under the pretext of protecting the rights of the Uygur ethnic group," Manoilo said.
While China is effectively fighting terrorism and extremism, the United States is trying to smear these anti-terrorism and preventive measures as massive violations of human rights, he concluded.
On Thursday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the Chinese government and people express strong indignation at and firm opposition to the signing of the so-called "Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020" by the United States.
This so-called act deliberately denigrated the human rights conditions in China's Xinjiang, viciously attacked the Chinese government's Xinjiang policy, blatantly violated international law and basic norms governing international relations, and grossly interfered in China's internal affairs, the ministry said.
关系词代词和关系副词,你懂得如何抉择吗?
英语单词教学详解:A nest egg 储备金
To pull the plug on something 终止、遏止
单词教学详解:To have deep pockets 资金雄厚
whose在定语从句中的用法详解
四大连词的区别,你知道是什么吗?
汽车茧居族 carcoons
定语从句详解:who、whom、whose、which、that引导的定语从句
两个表示解决的英语单词,你真的会用吗
别顾着晒单拉仇恨了,来学学“拉仇恨”英文怎么说
教学详解:Dirt cheap 非常便宜
英语答题有技巧,选择题应该这么答
定语从句详解:考研英语语法篇
日常英语应用之手机用篇
形容词不同类别详解及用法介绍
语法:副词 there 的用法
从属连词有哪些?它们与从句息息相关
关系代词which,that,who的区别
傅莹:《中国为什么对南海仲裁说不》
日常英语介绍:社交媒体用语
Binge-watch “刷剧”、连续看片
other和another区别:两种不同的“另一个”
老外告诉你:什么时候该“被动”?
常用字母或字母组合与元音字母组合发音规律
这个夏天你“心理中暑”了吗?
你周围有“上镜的土豆”吗?
谁患了“盲目爱娃症”?
一份时间双倍用:学习如何事半功倍?
教你从头开始学定语从句
形容词ing和ed形式的区别及主被动用法
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |