PYONGYANG, Dec. 16 -- A research institute under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) issued a statement Sunday night criticizing the United States for imposing sanctions against DPRK officials.
The statement was issued by the policy research director of the Institute for American Studies of the Foreign Ministry, and released by DPKR's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) without giving the name of the director.
The statement said the top leaders of the DPRK and the United States committed themselves to improving the DPRK-U.S. relations at the historic DPRK-U.S. summit held in Singapore in June, and currently the bilateral relations are advancing along the firm will of the two leaders to follow through their joint statement issued then.
However, it added, over the past six months, the U.S. State Department and the Treasury Department have carried out eight rounds of sanctions against DPRK companies, individuals and ships as well as other third countries through false pretexts.
"Recently, the U.S. is resorting to an anti-DPRK human rights plot in such a way that it carries a deliberate provocation by adding high-ranking government officials of the DPRK" to its unilateral sanctions list, while taking issue with a non-existent "human rights issue," the statement pointed out.
Washington announced on Dec. 10 that it would impose sanctions against three DPRK officials for serious human rights abuses and censorship, and DPRK's statement on Sunday seems to be a semi-official response to the U.S. decision.
"Far from the statements of the (U.S.) president, the State Department is instead bent on bringing DPRK-U.S. relations back to the status of last year which was marked by exchanges of fire. I cannot help but throw doubt on the ulterior motive of the State Department," KCNA quoted the director as saying, adding that the sanctions against the DPRK "would not work."
The director also stressed that if the high-ranking politicians within the U.S. administration wished to "drive us into giving up nuclear weapons by way of increasing anti-DPRK sanctions and pressure," it would be a miscalculation, and "will block the path to denuclearization on the Korean peninsula forever."
GMAT写作范文23篇(国家和艺术的关系)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(2)
GMAT写作:满分作文必备模板(二)
GMAT写作模板:统一与分歧(5)
GMAT写作AA模版
GMAT写作模板句型200句(3)
剖析GMAT作文的结构:骨与肉
GMAT写作范文23篇(新与旧)
GMAT写作可引用的经典闪光句型(下)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(14)
GMAT写作方法及参考范文(四)
GMAT写作5.5分作文模板分享
GMAT写作模板句型200句(13)
GMAT写作范文23篇(不同领域间的交流)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(8)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(15)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(18)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(11)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(12)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(17)
GMAT写作高分范文:公司盈利与社会责任
GMAT写作范文23篇(理想和现实)
GMAT写作可引用的经典闪光句型(上)
GMAT写作高分的两个注意事项
GMAT写作范文23篇(技术进步对人类的影响)
GMAT写作必背200句(19)
GMAT写作模板句型200句(20)
GMAT写作方法及参考范文(三)
GMAT写作:满分作文必备模板(一)
GMAT写作:逻辑问题分析论证句式
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |