A reader in Florida, apparentlybruised(擦伤)by some personal experience, writes in to complain, "If I steal a nickel's worth of merchandise, I am a thief and punished; but if I steal the love of another's wife, I am free."
This is a prevalentmisconception(误解,错觉)in many people's minds---that love, like merchandise, can be "stolen". Numerous states, in fact, have enacted laws allowing damages for "alienation of affections".
But love is not a commodity; the real thing cannot be bought, sold, traded or stolen. It is an act of the will, a turning of the emotions, a change in the climate of the personality.
When a husband or wife is "stolen" by another person, that husband or wife was already ripe for the stealing, was already predisposed toward a new partner. The "lovebandit(强盗,土匪)" was only taking what was waiting to be taken, what wanted to be taken.
We tend to treat persons like goods. We even speak of the children "belonging" to their parents. But nobody "belongs" to anyone else. Each person belongs to himself, and to God. Children are entrusted to their parents, and if their parents do not treat them properly, the state has a right to remove them from their parents' trusteeship.
Most of us, when young, had the experience of a sweetheart being taken from us by somebody more attractive and more appealing. At the time, we may have resented this intruder---but as we grew older, we recognized that the sweetheart had never been ours to begin with. It was not the intruder that "caused" the break, but the lack of a real relationship.
On the surface, many marriages seem to break up because of a "third party". This is, however, a psychological illusion. The other woman or the other man merely serves as a pretext for dissolving or a marriage that had already lost its essential integrity.
Nothing is more futile and more self-defeating than the bitterness of spurned love, the vengeful feeling that someone else has "come between" oneself and a beloved. This is always a distortion of reality, for people are not the captives or victims of others---they are free agents, working out their own destinies for good or for ill.
But the rejected lover or mate cannot afford to believe that his beloved has freely turned away from him--- and so he ascribes sinister or magical properties to the interloper. He calls him a hypnotist or a thief or a home-breaker. In the vast majority of cases, however, when a home is broken, the breaking has begun long before any "third party" has appeared on the scene.
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (13)
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (22)
考研英语阅读篇章之Facebook用户更讨厌自己的高中同学
考研英语阅读篇章之春假
考研英语阅读篇章之当阅读成为一种风景
考研英语阅读篇章之人工智能
考研英语阅读篇章之留学生活面面观
考研英语阅读篇章之习近平2014访欧精彩语录
考研英语阅读篇章之10个好习惯利用好时间
考研英语阅读篇章之你是手机痴迷症候群吗
考研英语阅读篇章伴侣选择男女标准各不同
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (33)
考研英语阅读篇章之物联网
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (43)
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (40)
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (29)
考研英语阅读篇章之个性青年迷笛音乐节上遛白菜
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (41)
考研英语阅读篇章之睡前玩手机影响睡眠伤眼睛
考研英语阅读篇章多喝咖啡有助视力
考研英语阅读篇章之肌肉情结
考研英语阅读篇章之完美第一印象十大法则
考研英语阅读篇章之抑郁症
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (37)
考研英语阅读篇章之与清明节有关的英文表达
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (12)
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (39)
考研英语阅读篇章之EQ是把双刃剑
2015年考研英语阅读习题演练 (34)
考研英语阅读篇章之创新思维需要五大技能
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |