Reader question:
Please explain “stolen a march” in the following:
An Italian restaurant in India has stolen a march on the global chain Domino’s by delivering a pizza by drone in the heart of its commercial capital Mumbai.
My comments:
Domino’s, being a global name, is the Goliath of the pizza business in India. The Italian restaurant named (or rather unnamed – in this paragraph) in this story is a David (or minnow) in terms of competing with the giant Domino in the local market.
However, in one area of competition, the Italian restaurant has moved ahead of its big rival by delivering a pizza by drone in the commercial capital of Mumbai.
In doing that, the Italian restaurant has stolen a march on its big rival – by stealthily gaining a potentially important advantage on its big rival.
“Stealing a march on someone” means exactly that, gaining an unexpected advantage on someone, especially a rival.
This is an expression derived from early warfare. In the early days, long before trucks, planes and drones were invented, of course, armies used soldiers’ legs to move about – hence the term foot soldiers. And when officers order soldiers to walk or move, they shout “March!”
Hence the “march” in the expression “stealing a march”. By “stealing a march” on the enemy, it originally means that your army has arrived at a certain strategic point, a mountain pass, for instance earlier than does the enemy.
“Stealing” means you’ve done this stealthily, by walking (marching) all night for example, when your enemies are all asleep. By stealing a march on the enemy therefore, you are in position to launch a surprise attack on them because your earlier footwork, so to speak, has caught them unawares.
In our example, the Italian restaurant has surprised Domino’s by doing the drone delivery first – supposing Domino’s also has a mind to do the same.
At any rate, being the first to do it is a great advantage for the Italians to make use of. For the time being, it has all the drone market to itself. Plus, the novelty it creates, the surprise element, should by itself generate a lot of good publicity for the Italian restaurant.
Alright, here are examples of other people who have managed, over the years, to steal a march on their rival or rivals:
1. President Clinton probably thought he was stealing a march on everyone in Washington when he proposed reversing the trend of declining defense spending and adding $110 billion to the Pentagon’s coffers over the next six years.
But this week, sniping broke out on both of his flanks. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, sensing an opening, said what they really need is a lot more--$148 billion, to be exact. And from the president’s left came a chorus of doubt whether any additional defense spending is needed.
This scenario contains the elements of a healthy, democratic debate. Critics of an increase make a worthy point: The nation should not automatically salute the chiefs’ request without closely questioning the missions they are assigned, and then the dollars required to meet them.
With the Cold War over and no formidable foe on the horizon, these critics ask, why does the nation need the biggest increase in military spending since the Reagan era? Why, indeed.
- A Defense Mission Too Costly? Chicago Tribune, January 25, 1999.
2. Financial markets are falling because there is no predictability. And, just as our markets have crashed, so too, has our language. Under the 111th Congress, our language no longer has any predictability. How can we create good policy and generate bipartisan support if our very language to achieve these ends is continually and capriciously changing?
Aristotle counseled against the inevitable ambiguity that occurs as a result of employing ambiguous names when describing an item, but Congress has not heeded that warning. A strange dynamic is currently occurring in congressional dialogue, in which euphemisms have stolen a march on reason, and what is said has become more important than what was done.
Most Americans are familiar with the renaming of the “second economic stimulus” to “the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” perhaps renamed because the word “second” reminds us that the first stimulus did not work as advertised.
Congressional semanticists have renamed federal government spending as an “investment” and claimed that a government check for a tax refund to a person who did not pay taxes is something other than “welfare.”
Congress, however, is not alone in exhibiting an inclination to doublespeak: the executive branch is suffering from a similar ailment. For example, last week, the administration signed an Executive Order for Ethics Commitments, including many restricting lobbyists, yet two days later issued a waiver for William Lynn, lobbyist, to become Deputy Secretary of Defense, citing special need, despite Lynn’s extensive conflicts of interests.
The administration seems to be saying: no lobbyists allowed-except the ones we do allow. Here’s another example. We are told by members of the administration that it’s our patriotic duty to pay taxes-except it seems, when you don’t - as in the cases of Tim Geithner and Tom Dashcle. The current administration seems determined to prove Orwell correct, that “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
- Economic Stimulus: Same Old Whine in a New Bottle, FederalNewsRadio.com, February 2, 2009.
3. Amazon has stolen a march on rivals Apple and Google by launching a new cloud-based music service, enabling users to play songs on computers and smartphones.
Unveiled today, the Amazon Cloud Drive offers 5GB of free online storage for music, while the Amazon Cloud Player allows users to listen to songs via web browsers or mobile apps.
The service is currently available on Blackberry, Palm and Android mobiles, but there is currently no support for Apple’s iOS operating system on iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch.
Music lovers will be able to use the service to upload their music library, including any tracks purchased from Apple’s iTunes, as well as buy new songs for digital playback.
- Amazon launches cloud music service, DigitalSpy.co.uk, March 29, 2011.
About the author:
Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.
烤鸭分享:雅思口语8分的三个小诀窍
G类雅思听力9分备考的经验谈
一个月能突破雅思口语8分的感想谈
一战拿下雅思的口语7分:眼神交流很重要
精雕细琢追求质量雅思的阅读9分轻松得
三战雅思拿下7.5分的关键的要素:动机和方法
“精英计划”造就的精英学员要把爱好融入学习
雅思阅读8.5分的感想:最重要的还是单词
雅思听力的备考应从基础教材入手
过来人的雅思口语经验:考前的心态很重要
烤鸭的分享:不靠模板也能拿下雅思写作7分
雅思口语9分大牛的口试过程详细的回忆
裸考雅思的7.5分英语学习源于积累
雅思阅读的满分烤鸭的一点小心得
学员何逸馨:首战雅思的阅读8.5分
学员朱子平:20天斩获雅思的听力9分
笨鸟狂练口语80天一战搞定雅思的口语6.5
马文暄:一步一个脚印踏上枫叶国度的留学路
雅思阅读8分考生分享阅读备考的经验
雅思阅读不能照搬四六级的做题的方法
雅思口语的备考就一个字:练
孙楚乔:备考三月斩下了雅思7分圆梦悉尼大学
雅思口语的经验:多准备熟悉的内容
零基础的三个月雅思7分速成的攻略
雅思听力8.5分总分7.5是如何炼成的呢?
屌丝的逆袭从六级470到雅思6.5分的心得的分享
西语女孩PK学术雅思不懈的努力三战拿下7.5
半年就通过雅思7:从六级318到雅思7分的飞跃
澳洲留学:浅析语言班VS雅思的考试
雅思听力8.5分的考前冲刺的方案
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |