Weapons of Defense
[10] The question of whether military force can be used ethically is one of the oldest and most difficult in history. To me, Hitler and World War II are sufficient proof that maintaining a strong U. S. Military force is a moral act.
[11] Some of my best friends disagree. To them, the ends do not justify the means. I asked one friend, who is a Quaker, what the U. S. should have done about Hitler. His response: "I don't know. But I believe we should have found an alternative other than force."
[12] That is an intellectually honest position, but to me not persuasive. On the whole, I feel the world is a better place if the U.S. has rocket fuel (Cordant), defense electronics (Litton), and Seasprite naval helicopters (Kaman), than if we don't.
防御武器:
军事力量能否被合乎道义地使用是历史上最古老的也是最困难的道德问题之一。对我来说,希特勒和二战足以证明美国保持强大的军事力量是道德的行为。
我的一些最好的朋友不同意这个观点。他们认为,目的正当并不能证明手段正当。我问一位教友派信徒的朋友,对希特勒这样的人美国应该怎么办。他说:“我不知道。但我相信我们应该找到另一种办法,而不是暴力。”
这是一个理智的诚实态度,但对我没有说服力。总的来说,我觉得如果美国有考顿公司生产的火箭燃料、利顿公司的电子防御系统和卡曼公司的海军用海怪直升机,这个世界会比我们没有这些武器更好一些。
Power Sources
[13] Nuclear power is another issue that people feel strongly about. In the wake of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, I can't argue that it's wrong to be concerned about the safety of nuclear plants. And yet, I believe people forget the hundreds of injuries and the massive pollution caused by oil-and coal-fueled electrical generating plants. Nuclear power, at least potentially, is a less polluting energy source than most of its competitors.
[14] The green so of cutting hack on energy use strikes me as misguided. Economic opportunity and social justice are much easier to achieve in an expanding economy. And an expanding economy virtually requires abundant energy.
[15] Alcohol, to some people, is the worst villain. And yet, when the nation tried to ban alcohol during prohibition, the experiment proved a failure. I can't resist adding that moderate drinkers have much lower death rates from heart attack than teetotalers.
[16] There are no liquor stocks I want to own presently. But at the right price, I would own one.
动力源:
核动力是另外一个引起人们强烈关注的问题。由于切尔诺贝利和三哩岛事件,我不能说考虑核电厂的安全是错误的。但是我想人们忘记了由用石油和煤作燃料的发电厂引起的成百上千种伤害和大量的污染。与其大多数竞争者相比,核动力至少从潜在能力上考虑是一种污染较小的能源。
我看这种减少能源使用的“绿色”解决方法是误入歧途。经济发展的良机和社会的公正在一个正在增长的经济中实现起来要容易得多。而一个正在发展增长的经济实际上是需要丰富的能源的。
对某些人来说,酒是个最坏的东西。但当国家试图禁酒时,结果总是归于失败。我忍不住要附带补充一句:适度的饮酒者比完全禁酒者心脏病死亡率要低得多。
我现在还不想买什么酒类股。但一旦价位合适,我是会买一种的。
外研版[2012版]七上Unit1《How do I write my homework on the computer》word学案
外研版英语七上Module 10《Unit 1 How do I write my homework on the computer》word说课教案
外研版七年级上册Module3 My new school 说课稿
外研版七年级第一学期语法汇集
外研版[2012版]七上Module6《A trip to the zoo》(Unit3)word教案
外研版[2012版]七上Module5《My school day》(Unit3)word教案
外研版七上《Module 3 My new school》(Unit 2)word教学设计
外研版七上《Module 3 My new school》word全模块教案
外研版七上《Module 3 My new school》(Unit 3)word语法讲解
外研版英语七上Module 2《Unit 1 I can speak English》word教案
外研版七上《Module 2 Me,my parents and my friends》word全模块教案
外研版七年级上册教学设计(1--6模块)
外研版七上《Module 3 My new school》(Unit 3)word学案
外研版七年级上册预备级 Module 2 教案
外研版新标准七年级上模块一Unit 1 教学设计
外研版七年级上册module5-unit1 教案
外研版七上Module 1《Unit 3 Language in use》word教案
外研版[2012版]七上Module9《People and places》(Unit3)word学案
外研版英语七年级上册module1-unit1 教学案
外研版[2012版]七上Module4《My everyday life》word学案
外研版英语七上Module 5《Unit 2 A lesson in good health》word教案
外研版英语七上《Moduel 6 An invitation to the cinema》word教案
外研版英语七上《Module 7 My school day》word教案
外研版英语七上《Module 5 Healthy food》word教案
外研版英语七上《Module 8 Different habits》word教案
外研版七上《Module 3 My new school》word学案
外研版英语七上Module 10《Unit 1 How do I write my homework on the computer》word教案
外研版英语七上《Module 4 Activities and the weather》word学案
外研版英语七上Starter Module 1《Unit 1 Hello, Miss Li》word教案
外研版[2012版]七上Module8《Choosing presents》word学案
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |