Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your opinion and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As can be argued, government rules can easily become obstacles to scientific achievements. Usually, most of the worlds headline-making scientific discoveries do not come through governmental establishments, admitting that fiscal funding is often essential to helping such success to happen in the private sector. It is false to suggest that the government should carry out and control scientific research because the issue is not only about money but also brains.
Just because public funds matter, it does not follow that the government should restrict that kind of freedom of thinking which is vital to imaginative minds. Apart from that, nothing is more naive than for the government to play the role of police and rule research activities. Yes, freedom--that is how scientific breakthroughs are born. It goes without saying that probably billions of governments money may be needed to carry out research projects in various scientific fields, but it must be considered that great scientists tend to ignore, or even go against the rules. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how many scientific discoveries could have been missed as a result of unnecessary regulations. To put it strongly, control is the death of scientific research.
Scientific research should not be forced in any event. It is because a research problem is less likely to be solved by any apparatus which money can buy than to be solved by the brains of a free head that money cannot always buy. Thus, it does not seem proper for official amateurs to know what on earth scientists are doing. Otherwise, it would not be called research in the real sense of the word. Trying to heavily monitor scientific brains is perhaps a dangerous attitude since the consequence is always too much foliage and too little fruit. That can explain in part why the government ought to shift most of the pledged fiscal spending from the public to the private sector.
All aspects taken into account, scientific research is two things: billions and brains. With little doubt, the success in a countrys scientific discoveries relies on both sufficient funding from the government and on creative minds from private companies in which pure research is worth every penny it costs. All the government has to do is grant money and expect that somewhere, something incredible is going to be known.
2012到来前用救赎电影来取暖
2010年奥斯卡提名:杰夫领跑最佳男主角
精彩影评:如果《阿凡达》从此被载入史册,那不是巧合
盘点历届奥斯卡的出位时刻(组图)
《阿凡达》幕后制作特辑“创造潘多拉”
绅士的幽默:十部英国喜剧电影解读
《海豚湾》奥斯卡获奖 震撼超过《阿凡达》
影响女人一生的十部电影
甜蜜错位:身体互换喜剧片
那些难忘的公益经典英文老歌
《爱丽丝梦游仙境》伦敦全球首映,英国王储查尔斯将出席
执迷,却执迷不悔的巴黎情结
票房最佳的15部同志电影
《阿凡达》续集可能要等上四年
不输大片的动画电影TOP10
雕琢时光 银幕时尚编年史
S老爹Dr.VDW现身绯闻女孩片场 回归动机不明或插足
《贫民富翁》女主芙蕾达.平托加盟古希腊神话动作片《众神的战争》
《阿凡达》北美票房突破七亿美元
2009年度佳片导读:2010颁奖季前瞻
想像力的盛宴:10部奇幻经典大作
颠覆影史的十大科幻电影
当心被吃掉:专吃男人的美女们
意外精彩:十个超赞的电影结局
12部情到深处的同性恋电影
《阿凡达》票房即将掀翻《泰坦尼克号》
CRI电影回顾:The Hurt Locke
第52届格莱美奖揭晓 碧昂斯夺六奖斯维夫特获年度专辑
ABC史诗巨作《宾虚》(Ben-Hur)预告片(泄露版)
2009:342部电影大回顾
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |