雅思阅读回忆1

.h1 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 22pt; MARGIN: 17pt 0cm 16.5pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 240%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify } .h2 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify } .h3 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify }

　　小幽灵

　　KILLER

　　幸福在哪里?

　　随着生活变得富裕，人们有了更多的选择，然而他们并没有因此而变得更加快乐。有人做了个实验，把实验对象分成两组，一组是每次都尝试做best choice的(Maxmiser)，另一组是只要good enough就可以了，也就是Satisfier。M每次做决定以前，都要花很多时间在比较和选择上，但是S只要看到自己喜欢的东西就买了。实验证明貌似是M比S不快乐。选择越多意味着机会成本越大，而人们对于失去感到的痛苦远远大于因为得到而感到的快乐，这就是为什么人们反而更加不快乐的原因。

　　文章后面提到一个theatre ticket实验。就是说买全票的人跟买折扣票的人相比，不去看戏的比率更小，原因在于the more people invest, the more they will feel regret if they dont use it.

　　文章的最后作者提议说M怎样变得快乐起来呢?那就是在某些不重要的情况下，适当缩小选择的范围，比如买衣服只要走两家店就好了。

　　It would seem trying to be a maximiser in everything would lead to being a maximiser of nothing as it indicates a lack of priorities or a procrastinating perfectionist.

　　A satisfier in everything would also lack priorities or prioritize their personal time and happiness. A satifier in most things and maximiser of personal priorities would seem optimal.