Think carefully about the following passage and the assignment below.
Gandhi labeled close friendships as dangerous because friends react on one another and sometimes loyalty to a friend will lead us into wrongdoing.
Do you agree or disagree that friends react on one another and can lead us into wrongdoing? Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your readings, experiences or observations.
Sartu的SAT写作范文
I think some time close friendships can be dangerous because friends know you better than others. Sometimes they react to your instability. They can make a big deal out of some things; they pressure you to do something for them that you dont want to do.
Sometimes they encourage you to do something. For example, your friends want you to join the basketball team or other sport or club, and that is good. Sometimes, however, they ask you to break rules just for them. If you do something bad, they might turn around and say my goodness, I can not believe you did that. Then they start to freak out and you become scared. But you wont be expecting this reaction from them because they are the ones who suggested it in the first place.
It is not okay that we sometimes commit sins for the sake of loyalty to others. Would you commit sin for the sake of loyalty to others? Sometimes, our friends want us to do extreme things. For instance, some people would tease others by saying they like someone else better. Sometimes it happens accidentally that we commit sins for the sake of our loyalty to others. We have to be alert, however, and keep ourselves from being sucked into something we dont want. Often when we do something that goes against our own beliefs, we later feel guilty and we wonder just how we ended up is such a situation.
Probably the best defense we have is to choose our friends wisely. We dont have to have a lot of friends, but a few loyal and trustworthy ones are what we need to find.
Comments SAT写作范文点评
This response needs a bit of work. It is not a terrible response. In fact, it quite adequately fulfills the needs of the assignment. Nothing is expressed with much depth. Good statements are made, but they lack specifics to back up the ideas expressed. Nevertheless, this is an acceptable response. No doubt SAT readers would give this essay a four.
The essay demonstrates critical thinking on the issue of friendship. The last lines are particularly perceptive. However, the examples are few and not very strong, therefore limiting the development of the essay. The response is organized, and it demonstrates coherence. This is one of those essays that you now would grow stronger if the student had the leisure to step away from it and return to it with a strong revision and bolstering of ideas.
一周热词回顾(11.14-11.20)
2016年“金酸莓奖”公布
与颜色相关的英语短语和习惯用法[1]
一周热词回顾(10.30)——
最高法发布“校园暴力”典型案件
体坛英语资讯:Chinas Peng/Jin lead pairs at Skate America
体坛英语资讯:Wang Shuang says Chinese players need support to play overseas
“情绪性进食”成澳大利亚人肥胖主因
党政机关发布的各类文件有啥区别?
一周热词回顾(11.7-11.13)
各国理想男士身材PK:你有“身材压力”吗?
鼓励家庭成员“合葬”
马伊琍吐槽“母婴室”引深思[1]
大众“排放作弊丑闻”继续升温
体坛英语资讯:Pascal Ackermann claims stage 3 victory of Tour of Guangxi
一周热词回顾(8.24-8.30)
北京建“通风廊道”透气
民政部叫停“婚姻状况证明”
从严治党关键是从严治吏
“雨水”到 拜丈人 拉保保[1]
“讨债公司”要合法经营
Facebook推出新“反应按钮”
网友争晒“阅兵蓝”[1]
一周热词回顾(10.1-10.9)
一起了解“阅兵流程”
美共和党参选人又提“定锚婴儿”
五维黑洞“黑环”可能存在
奥巴马强推“行政令”控枪
美国大选迎来“超级星期二”
一周热词回顾(8.17-8.23)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |