Microscopically, informational social influence occurs when one turns to the members of ones group to obtain accurate information. A person is most likely to use informational social influence in certain situations: when a situation is ambiguous, people become uncertain about what to do and they are more likely to depend on others for the answer; and during a crisis when immediate action is necessary, in spite of panic. Looking to other people can help ease fears, but unfortunately they are not always right. The more knowledgeable a person is, the more valuable they are as a resource. Thus people often turn to experts for help. But once again people must be careful, as experts can make mistakes too. Informational social influence often results in internalization or private acceptance, where a person genuinely believes that the information is right.
Informational social influence was first documented in Muzafer Sherifs autokinetic experiment. He was interested in how many people change their opinions to bring them in line with the opinion of a group. Participants were placed in a dark room and asked to stare at a small dot of light 15 feet away. They were then asked to estimate the amount it moved. The trick was there was no movement, it was caused by a visual illusion known as the autokinetic effect. Every person perceived different amounts of movement. Over time, the same estimate was agreed on and others conformed to it. Sherif suggested this was a simulation for how social norms develop in a society, providing a common frame of reference for people.
Subsequent experiments were based on more realistic situations. In an eyewitness identification task, participants were shown a suspect individually and then in a lineup of other suspects. They were given one second to identify him, making it a difficult task. One group was told that their input was very important and would be used by the legal community. To the other it was simply a trial. Being more motivated to get the right answer increased the tendency to conform. Those who wanted to be most accurate conformed 51% of the time as opposed to 35% in the other group.
Economists have suggested that fads and trends in society form as the result of individuals making rational choices based on information received from others. These informational cascades form quickly as people decide to ignore their internal signals and go along with what other people are doing. Cascades are presumed fragile, because people are aware that they are based on limited information. This is why fads often end as quickly as they begin.
SAT阅读文章中的历史常识
SAT阅读的题材问题解析
提高SAT阅读的方法中的两个误区
专家解读如何构建SAT阅读思维 攻克阅读难题
SAT阅读试题举例
怎样有效提高SAT阅读能力
牛人分享SAT阅读经验
SAT阅读长难句学习要点
SAT阅读技巧 单词和句子的关系
跟专家学习SAT阅读长难句
美国高考SAT阅读测试的应对策略
SAT阅读考试中容易混淆的36组单词
SAT阅读高分宝典 句型部分
如何提高SAT阅读应试能力
SAT阅读长难句解析
SAT阅读高分宝典 词汇部分
专家详解SAT阅读策略 助你突破阅读难题
SAT阅读长难句的理解是关键
SAT阅读长难句深入解析
专家解读SAT阅读考试的注意事项
SAT阅读词汇学习 谓语动词
SAT阅读句子填空题解题指导
名师指导SAT阅读的方法
SAT阅读高分宝典 篇章部分
SAT阅读长难句深入学习 5个实例
SAT阅读都读些什么?
SAT阅读修辞手法运用大全
如何正确理解SAT阅读长难句
SAT阅读材料:A Brief History of Western Music
突破SAT阅读长难句是拿高分的重点
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |