Microscopically, informational social influence occurs when one turns to the members of ones group to obtain accurate information. A person is most likely to use informational social influence in certain situations: when a situation is ambiguous, people become uncertain about what to do and they are more likely to depend on others for the answer; and during a crisis when immediate action is necessary, in spite of panic. Looking to other people can help ease fears, but unfortunately they are not always right. The more knowledgeable a person is, the more valuable they are as a resource. Thus people often turn to experts for help. But once again people must be careful, as experts can make mistakes too. Informational social influence often results in internalization or private acceptance, where a person genuinely believes that the information is right.
Informational social influence was first documented in Muzafer Sherifs autokinetic experiment. He was interested in how many people change their opinions to bring them in line with the opinion of a group. Participants were placed in a dark room and asked to stare at a small dot of light 15 feet away. They were then asked to estimate the amount it moved. The trick was there was no movement, it was caused by a visual illusion known as the autokinetic effect. Every person perceived different amounts of movement. Over time, the same estimate was agreed on and others conformed to it. Sherif suggested this was a simulation for how social norms develop in a society, providing a common frame of reference for people.
Subsequent experiments were based on more realistic situations. In an eyewitness identification task, participants were shown a suspect individually and then in a lineup of other suspects. They were given one second to identify him, making it a difficult task. One group was told that their input was very important and would be used by the legal community. To the other it was simply a trial. Being more motivated to get the right answer increased the tendency to conform. Those who wanted to be most accurate conformed 51% of the time as opposed to 35% in the other group.
Economists have suggested that fads and trends in society form as the result of individuals making rational choices based on information received from others. These informational cascades form quickly as people decide to ignore their internal signals and go along with what other people are doing. Cascades are presumed fragile, because people are aware that they are based on limited information. This is why fads often end as quickly as they begin.
雅思口语天天练:高效能人士的七个习惯
每日雅思词汇:cooking 技法
每天雅思词汇:各类人群
雅思写作高难词汇整理:法律专集
每日雅思词汇:留学必知的专业词汇(三)
每日雅思词汇:老龄社会
每日雅思词汇:素食主义
每日雅思词汇:山寨 copycat
每日雅思词汇:各种水果的单词
学术类雅思的1128个核心词汇
每日雅思词汇:各种卡的表达
每日雅思词汇:留学必知的专业词汇(一)
每日雅思词汇:早餐要吃好
雅思阅读常用词汇:医学类基本词汇
每日雅思词汇:婚姻纠纷
雅思写作教育类重点词汇总结
每日雅思词汇:智能手机
每日雅思词汇:足球术语
每日雅思词汇:green相关的谚语
每日雅思词汇:Sleep介词词组汇总
每日雅思词汇:过期食品
雅思词汇的记忆方法及建议分享
每日雅思词汇:市场经济
每日雅思词汇:足坛扫黑
每日雅思词汇:描写礼物的词汇
每日雅思词汇:雨量的表达
每日雅思词汇:体形丰满的各种说法
每日雅思词汇:这些词的意思你真了解吗?
每日雅思词汇:团购
每日雅思词汇:描写电影的词汇
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |