Microscopically, informational social influence occurs when one turns to the members of ones group to obtain accurate information. A person is most likely to use informational social influence in certain situations: when a situation is ambiguous, people become uncertain about what to do and they are more likely to depend on others for the answer; and during a crisis when immediate action is necessary, in spite of panic. Looking to other people can help ease fears, but unfortunately they are not always right. The more knowledgeable a person is, the more valuable they are as a resource. Thus people often turn to experts for help. But once again people must be careful, as experts can make mistakes too. Informational social influence often results in internalization or private acceptance, where a person genuinely believes that the information is right.
Informational social influence was first documented in Muzafer Sherifs autokinetic experiment. He was interested in how many people change their opinions to bring them in line with the opinion of a group. Participants were placed in a dark room and asked to stare at a small dot of light 15 feet away. They were then asked to estimate the amount it moved. The trick was there was no movement, it was caused by a visual illusion known as the autokinetic effect. Every person perceived different amounts of movement. Over time, the same estimate was agreed on and others conformed to it. Sherif suggested this was a simulation for how social norms develop in a society, providing a common frame of reference for people.
Subsequent experiments were based on more realistic situations. In an eyewitness identification task, participants were shown a suspect individually and then in a lineup of other suspects. They were given one second to identify him, making it a difficult task. One group was told that their input was very important and would be used by the legal community. To the other it was simply a trial. Being more motivated to get the right answer increased the tendency to conform. Those who wanted to be most accurate conformed 51% of the time as opposed to 35% in the other group.
Economists have suggested that fads and trends in society form as the result of individuals making rational choices based on information received from others. These informational cascades form quickly as people decide to ignore their internal signals and go along with what other people are doing. Cascades are presumed fragile, because people are aware that they are based on limited information. This is why fads often end as quickly as they begin.
两个月雅思5.5到6.5的备考的历程
雅思8分考生的40天的自学心得
雅思口语9分考生谈暑假备考的方法
雅思6分菜鸟的写作的经验分享
雅思7分考生分享阅读备考的心经
雅思口语两战6分经验怎一个背字了得
雅思写作1个半月从6.5到7.5分的经验谈
雅思听力7.5阅读8分的详细的备考过程
雅思东南大学考点的全攻略
牛人分享雅思口语的答题公式
雅思口语8.5分大牛分享的备考经验
雅思阅读8.5分知识助我一臂之力
雅思5.5分到7分需要准备多长时间
高手分享雅思阅读9分备考的心得
雅思8分应考建议基础是才是决胜之道
雅思口语复议成功的经验分享
非英专业托福转雅思备考经验
雅思考试7分备考心得口语备考
雅思7.5分的一个半月复习的经验
雅思听读双8.5听力看老友记阅读掐时间
高中生10天备战雅思获7分经验总结
乌鲁木齐雅思考场考试的流程及经验
40天自学雅思8分心得分享经验+资料
一个月备考拿下雅思7分心得体会
超简单的雅思7分备考的经验
英国曼彻斯特大学雅思考试流程的分享
一战雅思阅读满分的经验分享
雅思牛人经验谈脱产复习 稳扎稳打拿高分
首战裸考二战备考23天拿下雅思6.5分的详细经验
一个半月拿下雅思7.5分备考经验
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |