Microscopically, informational social influence occurs when one turns to the members of ones group to obtain accurate information. A person is most likely to use informational social influence in certain situations: when a situation is ambiguous, people become uncertain about what to do and they are more likely to depend on others for the answer; and during a crisis when immediate action is necessary, in spite of panic. Looking to other people can help ease fears, but unfortunately they are not always right. The more knowledgeable a person is, the more valuable they are as a resource. Thus people often turn to experts for help. But once again people must be careful, as experts can make mistakes too. Informational social influence often results in internalization or private acceptance, where a person genuinely believes that the information is right.
Informational social influence was first documented in Muzafer Sherifs autokinetic experiment. He was interested in how many people change their opinions to bring them in line with the opinion of a group. Participants were placed in a dark room and asked to stare at a small dot of light 15 feet away. They were then asked to estimate the amount it moved. The trick was there was no movement, it was caused by a visual illusion known as the autokinetic effect. Every person perceived different amounts of movement. Over time, the same estimate was agreed on and others conformed to it. Sherif suggested this was a simulation for how social norms develop in a society, providing a common frame of reference for people.
Subsequent experiments were based on more realistic situations. In an eyewitness identification task, participants were shown a suspect individually and then in a lineup of other suspects. They were given one second to identify him, making it a difficult task. One group was told that their input was very important and would be used by the legal community. To the other it was simply a trial. Being more motivated to get the right answer increased the tendency to conform. Those who wanted to be most accurate conformed 51% of the time as opposed to 35% in the other group.
Economists have suggested that fads and trends in society form as the result of individuals making rational choices based on information received from others. These informational cascades form quickly as people decide to ignore their internal signals and go along with what other people are doing. Cascades are presumed fragile, because people are aware that they are based on limited information. This is why fads often end as quickly as they begin.
雅思听力备考攻略
雅思听力考场上的4个技巧
雅思听力考试的读题方法的介绍
雅思听力的备考重点及注意事项的总结
雅思听力句型的讲解
雅思听力各类题型的高分解题的技巧
雅思听力section4的答题的技巧
雅思听力考试的精听泛听技巧讲解
雅思听力考试备考的技巧
雅思听力考前冲刺技巧的总结
雅思听力答题方法的介绍
雅思听力判断题的三个技巧
雅思听力抓段落主题的技巧
雅思听力难点解析大额数字
雅思听力考试常见问题的总结
冲刺阶段雅思听力备考的技巧
雅思听力长段落解题的技巧
雅思听力低分7大原因
雅思听力备考材料的分享
雅思听力备考的策略
雅思听力图书馆场景试题解析
基础薄弱的考生应该怎么备考雅思听力
雅思听力成绩提高的4个基础步骤
雅思听力解题思路的分析
雅思听力不可忽视的细节答案拼写
快速提高雅思听力方法的总结
雅思听力单选题答题的技巧
雅思听力成绩提高需要解决的两个问题
雅思听力考试必备答题的技巧
雅思听力备考技巧
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |