Microscopically, informational social influence occurs when one turns to the members of ones group to obtain accurate information. A person is most likely to use informational social influence in certain situations: when a situation is ambiguous, people become uncertain about what to do and they are more likely to depend on others for the answer; and during a crisis when immediate action is necessary, in spite of panic. Looking to other people can help ease fears, but unfortunately they are not always right. The more knowledgeable a person is, the more valuable they are as a resource. Thus people often turn to experts for help. But once again people must be careful, as experts can make mistakes too. Informational social influence often results in internalization or private acceptance, where a person genuinely believes that the information is right.
Informational social influence was first documented in Muzafer Sherifs autokinetic experiment. He was interested in how many people change their opinions to bring them in line with the opinion of a group. Participants were placed in a dark room and asked to stare at a small dot of light 15 feet away. They were then asked to estimate the amount it moved. The trick was there was no movement, it was caused by a visual illusion known as the autokinetic effect. Every person perceived different amounts of movement. Over time, the same estimate was agreed on and others conformed to it. Sherif suggested this was a simulation for how social norms develop in a society, providing a common frame of reference for people.
Subsequent experiments were based on more realistic situations. In an eyewitness identification task, participants were shown a suspect individually and then in a lineup of other suspects. They were given one second to identify him, making it a difficult task. One group was told that their input was very important and would be used by the legal community. To the other it was simply a trial. Being more motivated to get the right answer increased the tendency to conform. Those who wanted to be most accurate conformed 51% of the time as opposed to 35% in the other group.
Economists have suggested that fads and trends in society form as the result of individuals making rational choices based on information received from others. These informational cascades form quickly as people decide to ignore their internal signals and go along with what other people are doing. Cascades are presumed fragile, because people are aware that they are based on limited information. This is why fads often end as quickly as they begin.
雅思词汇秘籍:从“sunday”看词汇记忆
“烤鸭”必读:雅思口语复习需注意四方面
“烤鸭”必读:突破雅思听力的七个小秘诀
“烤鸭”必读:雅思口语三大破绽有机可乘
考生经验总结:雅思口语中易犯的发音错误
“烤鸭”必读:雅思听力答题和理解应同步
“烤鸭”必读:雅思阅读判断题法则
“烤鸭”必读:雅思口语高分的三点策略
雅思名师支招:口试别出错 写作熟评分标准
“烤鸭”福利贴:雅思写作十种常用连接词
“烤鸭”必读:学累了吧?来几段绕口令
考生分享:雅思口语三部分高分亲身经验
“烤鸭”必读:托福听力与雅思听力的区别
“烤鸭”必读:如何扫除雅思听力死角
从点到面:雅思阅读实力提升计划
“烤鸭”必读:雅思听力考场六大实用技巧
经验谈:快速突破雅思阅读的懒人备考方法
“烤鸭”必读:雅思快速阅读的四种练习法
技巧分享:雅思听力八大失分点及解决技巧
雅思听力备考的三种状态及应对方法
名师指导:雅思和改革后的六级先管哪个?
学会英式思维的关键:学会反义疑问句
技巧分享:三大建议让雅思写作“简洁漂亮”
老“烤鸭”经验谈从雅思4.5如何到8
福利贴:揭开雅思口语不流利的“四宗罪”
“烤鸭”必读:四大备考策略提高雅思听力
“烤鸭”必读:雅思阅读9分备考心得分享
听力达人分享:雅思听力7.5分是这么来的
烤鸭必读:雅思听力考试中的正态分布原则
“烤鸭”必读:雅思阅读题型简介
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |