Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
This statement is fundamentally correct; public figures should indeed expect to lose their privacy. After all, we are a society of voyeurs wishing to transform our mundane lives; and one way to do so is to live vicariously through the experiences of others whose lives appear more interesting than our own. Moreover, the media recognize this societal foible and exploit it at every opportunity. Nevertheless, a more accurate statement would draw a distinction between political figures and other public figures; the former have even less reason than the latter to expect to be left alone, for the reason that their duty as public servants legitimizes public scrutiny of their private lives.
The chief reason why I generally agree with the statement is that, for better or worse, intense media attention to the lives of public figures raises a presumption in the collective mind of the viewing or reading public that our public figures lives are far more interesting than our own. This presumption is understandable. After all, I think most people would agree that given the opportunity for even fleeting fame they would embrace it without hesitation. Peering into the private lives of those who have achieved our dreams allows us to live vicariously through those lives.
Another reason why I generally agree with the statement has to do with the forces that motivate the media. For the most part, the media consist of large corporations whose chief objective is to maximize shareholder profits. In pursuit of that objective the media are simply giving the public what they demand a voyeuristic look into the private lives of public figures. One need look no further than a newsstand, local-television news broadcast, or talk show to find ample evidence that this is so. For better or worse, we love to peer at people on public pedestals, and we love to watch them fall off. The media know this all too well, and exploit our obsession at every opportunity.
Nevertheless, the statement should be qualified in that a political figure has less reason to expect privacy than other public figures. Why? The private affairs of public servants become our business when those affairs adversely affect our servants ability to serve us effectively, or when our servants betray our trust. For example, several years ago the chancellor of a university located in my city was expelled from office for misusing university funds to renovate his posh personal residence. The scandal became front-page news in the campus newspaper, and prompted a useful system-wide reform. Also consider the Clinton sex scandal, which sparked a debate about the powers and duties of legal prosecutors vis4-vis the chief executive. Also, the court rulings about executive privilege and immunity, and even the impeachment proceedings, all of which resulted from the scandal, might serve as useful legal precedents for the future.
Admittedly, intense public scrutiny of the personal lives of public figures can carry harmful consequences, for the public figure as well as the society. For instance, the Clinton scandal resulted in enormous financial costs to taxpayers, and it harmed many individuals caught up in the legal process. And for more that a year the scandal served chiefly to distract us from our most pressing national and global problems. Yet, until as a society we come to appreciate the potentially harmful effects of our preoccupation with the lives of public figures, they can expect to remain the cynosures of our attention.
这场全英文演讲大咖云集,新时代大讲堂Vison China精彩开讲![1]
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Beijing aims for high-quality growth
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: Pences trip fails to revive peace prospects in Mideast
国际英语资讯:Brazils Lula loses conviction appeal, shifting presidential election scenario
美国烟民人数历史新低
体坛英语资讯:DPRK, South Korea to march together at PyeongChang Olympic Winter Games: IOC
“Out of juice” 是没果汁了?太天真!
美国国会议员再次聚焦移民议案
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: U.S. Pence urges stronger alliance with Israel for lasting peace in Mideast
国内英语资讯:Macao has sufficient resources to cope with seasonal flu: health bureau
国内英语资讯:China determined to remove institutional barriers through reform
体坛英语资讯:Snookers China Open becomes second event to hit 1 million pound prize money
国际英语资讯:Uruguay to push for free trade agreement with China in Mercosur
国际英语资讯:Sri Lanka, Singapore sign Free Trade Agreement
党的十九届二中全会公报双语要点
美文欣赏:找准了前进方向,真的很幸福
有意外有惊喜!第90届奥斯卡提名名单划重点
川普对进口太阳能电池板和洗衣机征收高额关税
移动支付成习惯 支付宝用户继续增长
国际英语资讯:Latin America, Caribbean pledge support to further cooperation with China
威廉王子剃光头!竟是哈里吐槽发际线太高?
荷兰鹿特丹现“时尚警察” 穷人穿大牌将当场没收
国际英语资讯:Ofo kicks off operations in India to promote bicycle sharing culture
有意外有惊喜!第90届奥斯卡提名名单划重点
国内英语资讯:China, Arab countries agree to enhance parliamentary exchanges
国内英语资讯:BHP sees opportunities in China economic transformation
国内英语资讯:China clones worlds first macaques by method that made Dolly
国际英语资讯:Economic Watch: Chinas high quality growth underpins world economic recovery
国内英语资讯:Chinas top advisory body to amend its charter
随手涂鸦能看出性格 据说准到没朋友
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |