To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Whether successful leadership requires that a leader follow high ethical and moral standards is a complex issue--one that is fraught with the problems of defining ethics, morality, and successful leadership in the first place. In addressing the issue it is helpful to consider in turn three distinct forms of leadership: business, political, and social-spiritual.
In the business realm, successful leadership is generally defined as that which achieves the goal of profit maximization for a firms shareholders or other owners. Moreover, the prevailing view in Western corporate culture is that by maximizing profits a business leader fulfills his or her highest moral or ethical obligation. Many disagree, however, that these two obligations are the same. Some detractors claim, for example, that business leaders have a duty to do no intentional harm to their customers or to the society in which they operate--for example, by providing safe products and by implementing pollution control measures. Other detractors go further--to impose on business leaders an affirmative obligation to protect consumers, preserve the natural environment, promote education, and otherwise take steps to help alleviate societys problems.
Whether our most successful business leaders are the ones who embrace these additional obligations depends, of course, on ones own definition of business success. In my observation, as business leaders become subject to closer scrutiny by the media and by social activists, business leaders will maximize profits in the long term only by taking reasonable steps to minimize the social and environmental harm their businesses cause. This observation also accords with my personal view of a business leaders ethical and moral obligation.
In the political realm the issue is no less complex. Definitions of successful political leadership and of ethical or moral leadership are tied up in the means a leader uses to wield his or her power and to obtain that power in the first place. One useful approach is to draw a distinction between personal morality and public morality. In my observation personal morality is unrelated to effective political leadership. Modern politics is replete with examples of what most people would consider personal ethical failings: the marital indiscretions of President Kennedy, for instance. Yet few would disagree that these personal moral choices adversely affected his ability to lead.
In contrast, pubhc morality and successful leadership are more closely connected. Consider the many leaders, such as Stalin and Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious violators of public morality. Ultimately such leaders forfeit their leadership as a result of the immoral means by which they obtained or wielded their power. Or consider less egregious examples such as President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture of it. It seems that in the short term unethical public
behavior might serve a political leaders interest in preserving his or her power; yet in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leaders down- fall that is, in failure.
One must also consider a third type of leadership: social-spiritual. Consider notable figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, whom few would disagree were eminently successful in leading others to practice the high ethical and moral standards which they advocated. However, I would be hard-pressed to name one successful social or spiritual leader whose leadership was predicated on the advocacy of patently unethical or immoral behavior. The reason for this is simple: high standards for ones own public morality are prerequisites for successful social-spiritual leadership.
In sum, history informs us that effective political and social-spiritual leadership requires adherence to high standards of public morality. However, when it comes to business leadership the relationship is less clear; successful business leaders must strike a balance between achieving profit maximization and fulfilling their broader obligation to the society, which comes with the burden of such leadership.
雅思阅读:临场发挥把握3点技巧
雅思阅读分类词汇:心理类
雅思阅读List of headings题型精讲
雅思阅读:The screw tightens
雅思阅读分类词汇:生物/生理类
阅读真题相似文章:天才儿童
雅思阅读:Amazon River shaped by see-saw tilt of continent
雅思阅读diagram/flowchart/table completion题型精讲
雅思阅读:Whose lost decade?
雅思阅读考场生词攻略
雅思阅读长句破解两绝招
攻克雅思阅读生词:专家教你猜词义
有关雅思阅读的一点忠告与建议
雅思阅读Summary题型精讲
雅思阅读难句透析:省略句
雅思拓展阅读:看《阿凡达》纳美人外星语言的诞生
阅读真题相似文章:蚂蚁智力
雅思阅读4大高分攻略
雅思阅读:Unlike in 2008, banks' exposures are there for all to see
雅思阅读matching(因果关系搭配)题型精讲
雅思阅读难句透析:分割结构
备考雅思阅读考试技巧
雅思阅读真题词汇:考拉
雅思阅读真题词汇:鸟类方向感
雅思阅读分类词汇:文化类
雅思拓展阅读:《阿凡达》故事情节
雅思阅读:The euro zone's unexploded ordnance is no longer nuclear
举例教你看穿雅思阅读题的考点
雅思阅读:Difference Engine: Volt farce
雅思阅读:Coarse work
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |