To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Whether successful leadership requires that a leader follow high ethical and moral standards is a complex issue--one that is fraught with the problems of defining ethics, morality, and successful leadership in the first place. In addressing the issue it is helpful to consider in turn three distinct forms of leadership: business, political, and social-spiritual.
In the business realm, successful leadership is generally defined as that which achieves the goal of profit maximization for a firms shareholders or other owners. Moreover, the prevailing view in Western corporate culture is that by maximizing profits a business leader fulfills his or her highest moral or ethical obligation. Many disagree, however, that these two obligations are the same. Some detractors claim, for example, that business leaders have a duty to do no intentional harm to their customers or to the society in which they operate--for example, by providing safe products and by implementing pollution control measures. Other detractors go further--to impose on business leaders an affirmative obligation to protect consumers, preserve the natural environment, promote education, and otherwise take steps to help alleviate societys problems.
Whether our most successful business leaders are the ones who embrace these additional obligations depends, of course, on ones own definition of business success. In my observation, as business leaders become subject to closer scrutiny by the media and by social activists, business leaders will maximize profits in the long term only by taking reasonable steps to minimize the social and environmental harm their businesses cause. This observation also accords with my personal view of a business leaders ethical and moral obligation.
In the political realm the issue is no less complex. Definitions of successful political leadership and of ethical or moral leadership are tied up in the means a leader uses to wield his or her power and to obtain that power in the first place. One useful approach is to draw a distinction between personal morality and public morality. In my observation personal morality is unrelated to effective political leadership. Modern politics is replete with examples of what most people would consider personal ethical failings: the marital indiscretions of President Kennedy, for instance. Yet few would disagree that these personal moral choices adversely affected his ability to lead.
In contrast, pubhc morality and successful leadership are more closely connected. Consider the many leaders, such as Stalin and Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious violators of public morality. Ultimately such leaders forfeit their leadership as a result of the immoral means by which they obtained or wielded their power. Or consider less egregious examples such as President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture of it. It seems that in the short term unethical public
behavior might serve a political leaders interest in preserving his or her power; yet in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leaders down- fall that is, in failure.
One must also consider a third type of leadership: social-spiritual. Consider notable figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, whom few would disagree were eminently successful in leading others to practice the high ethical and moral standards which they advocated. However, I would be hard-pressed to name one successful social or spiritual leader whose leadership was predicated on the advocacy of patently unethical or immoral behavior. The reason for this is simple: high standards for ones own public morality are prerequisites for successful social-spiritual leadership.
In sum, history informs us that effective political and social-spiritual leadership requires adherence to high standards of public morality. However, when it comes to business leadership the relationship is less clear; successful business leaders must strike a balance between achieving profit maximization and fulfilling their broader obligation to the society, which comes with the burden of such leadership.
少儿英语口语练习:Safty and injuries
少儿英语口语资料:A Shooting Star
最新幼儿园英语礼貌用语
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 01 你好
跟小小孩说英文:Going out on a rainy day 下雨天出门
少儿英语口语故事:夏日来到
少儿英语口语练习:Getting dressed
跟小小孩说英文:In the warehouse 在大卖场
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 02 你叫什么名字
跟小小孩说英文:Changing the diaper 换尿布
少儿英语口语资料
少儿英语口语故事:鹿
少儿英语口语练习:Washing up
少儿英语口语资料:south park
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 07 那是一个苹果
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 06 我想要牛奶
少儿英语口语资料:The horse and the ass
跟小小孩说英文:In the clothes shop 在服装店
少儿英语口语资料:心灵的窗口
跟小小孩说英文:What to wear? 穿什么衣服
少儿英语口语故事:晴朗的天
少儿英语常用礼貌用语
少儿英语口语资料:A strong donkey
少儿英语口语故事:格瑞丝
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 10 你是谁?
幼儿园英文礼貌用语
少儿英语口语练习:Playing toys
英蕊乐园游历记全集:Story 08 我喜欢橘子
跟小小孩说英文:Putting on a raincoat 穿雨衣
跟小小孩说英文:Buying clothes 买衣服
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |