To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Whether successful leadership requires that a leader follow high ethical and moral standards is a complex issue--one that is fraught with the problems of defining ethics, morality, and successful leadership in the first place. In addressing the issue it is helpful to consider in turn three distinct forms of leadership: business, political, and social-spiritual.
In the business realm, successful leadership is generally defined as that which achieves the goal of profit maximization for a firms shareholders or other owners. Moreover, the prevailing view in Western corporate culture is that by maximizing profits a business leader fulfills his or her highest moral or ethical obligation. Many disagree, however, that these two obligations are the same. Some detractors claim, for example, that business leaders have a duty to do no intentional harm to their customers or to the society in which they operate--for example, by providing safe products and by implementing pollution control measures. Other detractors go further--to impose on business leaders an affirmative obligation to protect consumers, preserve the natural environment, promote education, and otherwise take steps to help alleviate societys problems.
Whether our most successful business leaders are the ones who embrace these additional obligations depends, of course, on ones own definition of business success. In my observation, as business leaders become subject to closer scrutiny by the media and by social activists, business leaders will maximize profits in the long term only by taking reasonable steps to minimize the social and environmental harm their businesses cause. This observation also accords with my personal view of a business leaders ethical and moral obligation.
In the political realm the issue is no less complex. Definitions of successful political leadership and of ethical or moral leadership are tied up in the means a leader uses to wield his or her power and to obtain that power in the first place. One useful approach is to draw a distinction between personal morality and public morality. In my observation personal morality is unrelated to effective political leadership. Modern politics is replete with examples of what most people would consider personal ethical failings: the marital indiscretions of President Kennedy, for instance. Yet few would disagree that these personal moral choices adversely affected his ability to lead.
In contrast, pubhc morality and successful leadership are more closely connected. Consider the many leaders, such as Stalin and Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious violators of public morality. Ultimately such leaders forfeit their leadership as a result of the immoral means by which they obtained or wielded their power. Or consider less egregious examples such as President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture of it. It seems that in the short term unethical public
behavior might serve a political leaders interest in preserving his or her power; yet in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leaders down- fall that is, in failure.
One must also consider a third type of leadership: social-spiritual. Consider notable figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, whom few would disagree were eminently successful in leading others to practice the high ethical and moral standards which they advocated. However, I would be hard-pressed to name one successful social or spiritual leader whose leadership was predicated on the advocacy of patently unethical or immoral behavior. The reason for this is simple: high standards for ones own public morality are prerequisites for successful social-spiritual leadership.
In sum, history informs us that effective political and social-spiritual leadership requires adherence to high standards of public morality. However, when it comes to business leadership the relationship is less clear; successful business leaders must strike a balance between achieving profit maximization and fulfilling their broader obligation to the society, which comes with the burden of such leadership.
雅思口语天天练:简短口头禅
雅思口语范文:family members
雅思口语话题:a piece of music
雅思口语素材:名人名言-贝特兰.罗素
雅思口语必备材料:Environment & Pollution
雅思口语提高的一些经验方法
从考官的反应看雅思口语得分
雅思口语:一些“形”同“意”合的谚语翻译
雅思口语素材:名人名言-马孔.福布斯
基础薄弱如何突破雅思口语6分?
雅思口语分类词汇:地点-城市
雅思口语分类词汇:物品 奢侈品
雅思口语话题解析:A Childhood Song
雅思口语素材:好句推荐-世界是书
揭秘雅思口语评分标准的潜规则
雅思口语必须注意的三个陷阱
雅思口语高分表达:地点描述
雅思口语必备材料:City vs. Country
雅思口语分类词汇:事件-工作
雅思口语素材:好句推荐-天才的成分
雅思口语素材:名人名言-卡洛斯.埃卢
雅思口语话题解析:法律
雅思口语必备材料:Family
雅思口语话题:童年游戏捉迷藏
雅思口语考官是如何决定分数的?
中国考生在雅思口语中常犯的错误
雅思口语技巧:如何没话找话
雅思口语天天练:留学生活中的高频口语4
雅思口语考试一定要言之有物
如何在最后两个月备考雅思口语
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |