The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase peoples efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time.
The speaker contends that technologys primary goal should be to increase our efficiency for the purpose of affording us more leisure time. I concede that technology has enhanced our efficiency as we go about our everyday lives. Productivity software helps us plan and coordinate projects; intranets, the Internet, and satellite technology make us more efficient messengers; and technology even helps us prepare our food and access entertainment more efficiently. Beyond this concession, however, I find the speakers contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.
The chief reason for my disagreement lies in the empirical proof: with technological advancement comes diminished leisure time. In 1960 the average U.S. family included only one breadwinner, who worked just over 40 hours per week. Since then the average work week has increased steadily to nearly 60 hours today; and in most families there are now two breadwinners. What explains this decline in leisure despite increasing efficiency that new technologies have brought about? I contend that technology itself is the culprit behind the decline. We use the additional free time that technology affords us not for leisure but rather for work. As computer technology enables greater and greater office productivity it also raises our employers expectations--or demands--for production. Further technological advances breed still greater efficiency and, in turn, expectations. Our spiraling work load is only exacerbated by the competitive business environment in which nearly all of us work today. Moreover, every technological advance demands our time and attention in order to learn how to use the new technology. Time devoted to keeping pace with technology depletes time for leisure activities.
I disagree with the speaker for another reason as well: the suggestion that technologys chief goal should be to facilitate leisure is simply wrongheaded. There are far more vital concerns that technology can and should address. Advances in bio-technology can help cure and prevent diseases; advances in medical technology can allow for safer, less invasire diagnosis and treatment; advances in genetics can help prevent birth defects; advances in engineering and chemistry can improve the structural integrity of our buildings, roads, bridges and vehicles; information technology enables education while communication technology facilitates global participation in the democratic process. In short, health, safety, education, and freedom--and not leisure--are the proper final objectives of technology. Admittedly, advances in these areas sometimes involve improved efficiency; yet efficiency is merely a means to these more important ends.
In sum, I find indefensible the speakers suggestion that technologys value lies chiefly in the efficiency and resulting leisure time it can afford us. The suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence that technology diminishes leisure time, and it wrongly places leisure ahead of goals such as health, safety, education, and freedom as technologys ultimate aims.
新GRE阅读对词汇和句子考查方式简介
GRE阅读考点
灵活完成GRE阅读 词汇不再是绊脚石
GRE阅读文章两大特性解析
GRE阅读:主旨题怎么做
强势突破GRE阅读难点
如何正确对待GRE阅读
如何面对GRE阅读学术词汇
GRE阅读:句子结构分析
GRE阅读细节题也很重要
遇到GRE阅读类比题 肿么办?
GRE阅读两大题型解题技巧解析
GRE阅读:考古学
复习GRE阅读不可半途而废
GRE语文150如何考
GRE官网给出的GRE阅读题型
GRE阅读:温和的措辞
关于GRE阅读解题问题的相关解答
怎么搞定GRE阅读中生硬难懂的学术词汇
GRE阅读要有重点!
GRE阅读:逻辑题解析
如此方法助你提高GRE阅读速度
GRE阅读:能源
GRE阅读:分析结构很重要
如何集中火力攻破托福阅读?
GRE阅读练习题
GRE阅读:“给定”句子题怎么做
关于Emily Dickinson的GRE阅读备考材料
GRE阅读的这五大要点得好好把握!
GRE阅读:地球冷暖周期
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |