The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase peoples efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time.
The speaker contends that technologys primary goal should be to increase our efficiency for the purpose of affording us more leisure time. I concede that technology has enhanced our efficiency as we go about our everyday lives. Productivity software helps us plan and coordinate projects; intranets, the Internet, and satellite technology make us more efficient messengers; and technology even helps us prepare our food and access entertainment more efficiently. Beyond this concession, however, I find the speakers contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.
The chief reason for my disagreement lies in the empirical proof: with technological advancement comes diminished leisure time. In 1960 the average U.S. family included only one breadwinner, who worked just over 40 hours per week. Since then the average work week has increased steadily to nearly 60 hours today; and in most families there are now two breadwinners. What explains this decline in leisure despite increasing efficiency that new technologies have brought about? I contend that technology itself is the culprit behind the decline. We use the additional free time that technology affords us not for leisure but rather for work. As computer technology enables greater and greater office productivity it also raises our employers expectations--or demands--for production. Further technological advances breed still greater efficiency and, in turn, expectations. Our spiraling work load is only exacerbated by the competitive business environment in which nearly all of us work today. Moreover, every technological advance demands our time and attention in order to learn how to use the new technology. Time devoted to keeping pace with technology depletes time for leisure activities.
I disagree with the speaker for another reason as well: the suggestion that technologys chief goal should be to facilitate leisure is simply wrongheaded. There are far more vital concerns that technology can and should address. Advances in bio-technology can help cure and prevent diseases; advances in medical technology can allow for safer, less invasire diagnosis and treatment; advances in genetics can help prevent birth defects; advances in engineering and chemistry can improve the structural integrity of our buildings, roads, bridges and vehicles; information technology enables education while communication technology facilitates global participation in the democratic process. In short, health, safety, education, and freedom--and not leisure--are the proper final objectives of technology. Admittedly, advances in these areas sometimes involve improved efficiency; yet efficiency is merely a means to these more important ends.
In sum, I find indefensible the speakers suggestion that technologys value lies chiefly in the efficiency and resulting leisure time it can afford us. The suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence that technology diminishes leisure time, and it wrongly places leisure ahead of goals such as health, safety, education, and freedom as technologys ultimate aims.
研究:自私的人更容易当领导
谷歌宏达分别推新品迎战苹果
《时代》周刊封面上的八个乔布斯
乔布斯秘密遗产:生前已订四年产品计划
奇闻:双胞胎肤色竟一黑一白
体坛英语资讯:Kenyas Chepkirui, Kendagor banned for doping
福布斯推出最开心品牌榜:苹果排第一
最贵木乃伊在英博物馆沉睡多年
苹果创始人乔布私人葬礼今日举行 不会对外公开
概括乔布斯传奇的一生的经典图片
欧盟:产妇每天应有两小时哺乳假
宾夕法尼亚州的水龙头能点出火?
揭秘:乔布斯最后的日子见了谁?
体坛英语资讯:China eyes clean sweep on trampoline at Tokyo 2020
最震撼的表演:英国表演艺术家欲在舞台分娩
最贵十种甜品:看起来很美吃起来巨贵
英女子对钱币过敏 购物只好刷卡
大学生开“OFC”炸鸡店 奥巴马“荣登”招牌
科学家在月球上发现钛矿
悼念乔布斯:iSad 我悲伤
你是哪种人?拿酒杯的姿势出卖了你
原来这么简单的事儿我们都做错了!
研究:婴儿15月大就能明辨是非
英民众希望对流产妇女人性化医疗
索尼推出“口袋里的空调” 再也不怕夏天出门啦!
十二星座去哪里寻找真爱?
实拍彗星撞太阳 犹如焰火般灿烂
宇宙中可能存在其他“地球”
美军装备升级 纤维内衣裤护体
人际交往应把握好的十条建议
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |