Argument 47
The nation of Claria covers a vast physical area. But despite wide geographic differences, many citizens are experiencing rising costs of electricity. A recent study of household electric costs in Claria found that families who cooled their houses with fans alone spent more on electricity than did families using air conditioners alone for cooling. However, those households that reported using both fans and air conditioners spent less on electricity than those households that used either fans or air conditioners alone. Thus, the citizens of Claria should follow the studys recommendation and use both air conditioners and fans in order to save money on electricity.
In this argument, the arguer recommends that Claria should advise its citizens to install both air conditioners and fans for cooling in order to reduce the cost of electricity. To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that many citizens of Claria suffer from the rising costs of electricity. In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that using fans alone costs more than using air conditioners alone, and that using both air conditioners and fans costs less than either using fans or air conditioners alone. A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
In the first place, the arguer fails to take into account the geographical factors in the analysis. While we are informed that there are wide geographical differences in the nation of Claria, and that many citizens are experiencing rising costs of electricity, the arguer fails to make clear the exact number of those citizens or their percentage in the national population, as well as the geographical distribution of these citizens. If only a small portion of the whole population are experiencing the rising costs of electricity while most families do not have similar experience, then the reason might be that the former do not use electricity sparingly. In this case, the rising costs of those families have nothing to do with what kind of electric appliance they use to cool their houses. Or if only families living in hot areas are spending more money on cooling, then it is unwise to require citizens living in temperate and frigid zones to install both fans and air conditioners. In the absence of all this information, it is impossible for us to evaluate the recommended policy that is intended to help every household nationwide to reduce their electricity cost.
In the second place, the comparison in this argument is incomplete a
nd selective. The arguer discovers that using fans alone is more cost effective than using air conditioners alone, and that using both fans and air conditioners are the least expensive way of cooling. However, the arguer fails to provide any information regarding the actual amount of time for using, respectively, fans alone, air conditioners alone, and both fans and air conditioners in those three groups of surveyed families. It is very likely that these three groups of families are located in three very different climatic regions of Claria, and hence the amount of days of the year during which they need to cool their houses varies significantly. Families living in cooler areas of the nation certainly cool their houses for fewer hours and hence use less electricity than families living in hot areas, no matter what cooling appliance they use. Unless we are certain that the surveyed families live in the same climatic region, or that they need to cool their houses for the same amount of hours in the same year although they live in different regions, which is very unlikely, we have every reason to doubt the trustworthiness of this comparative study. Furthermore, the arguer ignores the possibility that the families who are spending more on electricity may be using more electricity for purposes other-than cooling. Unless the arguer also takes this factor into consideration, the comparison is unconvincing.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the percentage of the affected families and their geographical distribution. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information regarding the electric expense relevant to the actual amount of time for cooling among, respectively, the three groups of households and the amount of electricity used for other purposes in all three groups of families under survey.
树懒其实没那么懒:背包客拍到做瑜伽的树懒
美文欣赏:深呼吸,然后相信
这张动图火了:“哈利波特”和“弗罗多”你分得清吗?
日本本月底将全面停产盒式磁带录像机
特雷莎•梅将重组内阁 近半数成员或为女性
与时俱进 2016年应该这样写简历
穆雷温网称霸为英国挽回颜面 现场名人观众惊喜交加(组图)[1]
德普与小娇妻离婚 回顾浪子德普叔的往日情缘(组图)
国内英语资讯:Chinese mainland reports 2 new confirmed COVID-19 cases
Travel Alone 独自旅行
这10种食物,一直以来你都吃错了!(组图)[1]
纽约市将用紫外线灯对公交地铁进行消杀
视频:九只熊猫宝宝互相抢奶瓶萌翻天
No contest? 毫无争议
维多利亚时期的诡异风俗:与死人合影(组图)[1]
11种方法让书虫爱上锻炼(组图)[1]
盟友变敌人:戈夫踩鲍里斯上位 迫使其退选
神奇“机器人手套”让你秒获超人之力
盘点孩子们那些有趣的人生目标(组图)
英新首相组阁 鲍里斯任外长(组图)
女王的衣橱:白金汉宫展出女王服装
澳洲年度人物呼吁工作场所不说guys
荐片:儿童节,大孩子陪小孩子一起看的十部电影[1]
爸爸带娃不靠谱?逗比奶爸带娃爆笑瞬间(组图)
研究:雾霾天仍然可以适当锻炼
神奇墨水可瞬间消除永久性纹身
奥兰多枪击案 脸书启用“安全确认”功能[1]
不借助测谎仪 四招辨别说谎者
荷兰诞生首个机器人婴儿 机器人也可交配生子
淘宝上的奇葩雨具 总有一款适合你
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |