The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure afair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
10.The smaller parties are only concerned about the environment.
Answer Keys
1.T 2.NG 3.NG 4.F 5.NG 6.F 7.T 8.T 9.NG 10.F
上一篇: 雅思阅读材料:古希腊主神介绍(赫拉)
调查人员进入剑桥分析英国总部
国际英语资讯:Zimbabwean president urges officials to adopt new culture for economic growth
脸书创始人:在保护用户信息上我们显然犯了错
April Fools’ Day 愚人节
How to Avoid Post-Holiday Syndrome 如何避免节后综合症
司法部长塞申斯提出加强撞火枪托监管建议
The Happiness I Have 我拥有的幸福
The Booming Movie Market in China 中国电影市场的蓬勃发展
Extravagant Spending 奢侈的浪费
Spring Festival 春节
昂山素季铁杆支持者当选为缅甸新总统
2018年06月英语四级作文范文:限制塑料袋的使用
韩国和朝鲜确定历史性双边峰会日期
My Dream 我的理想
美国华盛顿州男子因发送可疑邮包被逮捕
国际英语资讯:Russia, Iran, Turkey praise contribution of Astana talks to Syrian settlement
Fathers Day 父亲节
Traditional Culture 传统文化
国际英语资讯:Clashes with Israeli soldiers in eastern Gaza kill 3 Palestinians
中国“天宫一号”残片坠落到南太平洋