The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure a
fair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
上一篇: 镜像法 解决雅思阅读判断题
下一篇: 雅思学术类阅读ABC(三)
香奈儿推出了首支3D打印的睫毛膏!你敢用吗?
新研究发现:牙膏增白剂或引发糖尿病
体坛英语资讯:Loew: first half nightmare
英国以国家安全为由推迟中资收购案
国家药监局正式批准首个四价流感疫苗上市
减少糖分摄入的小方法
还有这种操作!上海餐厅推出代剥小龙虾服务,你怎么看?
体坛英语资讯:Tunisia coach: thank all my players for their defensive attitude
体坛英语资讯:French coach Deschamps says all 23 players available for World Cup opener
为什么中国人的英语口语很难提高?问题在哪
体坛英语资讯:Mexicos Marquez becomes third man to play at five World Cups
NASA酝酿将人类送上金星
体坛英语资讯:Ronaldo the hero as Portugal draw 3-3 against an impressive Spain
体坛英语资讯:Analysis: Feelings mixed for U.S. public on 2026 FIFA World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Colombia star Rodriguez in doubt for World Cup opener against Japan
Autumn 秋天
体坛英语资讯:Cheryshev leads Russia to 5-0 rout of Saudi Arabia
生活因为爱情才显得真实
研究显示 长时间待在教室会导致近视
神奇!谷歌的AI技术竟能预测病人何时会死?