杨澜为李天一喊冤引争议

　　Questioned after the public to the netizen.

　　Face pressure from all sides, Yang Lan responded in the evening of 24, " my teacher Li Shuangjiang is modest and sincere, again to his son, feel sorry for miss li. Because I don't know when Li Tianyi beat the details, so the detention review is a year of punishment is appropriate is irresponsible. I 'm sorry. Everyone is equal before the law, no one is above the law. "

　　Yang Lan then continuously updated a few micro-blog, is all about the Li Tianyi case, and to the outside world. His face was questioned, Wu Zheng came out, said his wife is intended to question the validity of the system, but the first forgot to light card for victims, two do not know Lee was sentenced to a year in a labor camp on the basis of speech, fast error.

　　24 night at eleven thirty, Yang Lan once again an apology, " on female sexual abuse should be punished is the most basic standpoint, is self-evident! I intended to be suspected of micro-blog before transformation method that sent to a labour camp it is really effective, but the fact that understanding is not clear, the length of detention not properly. Sorry again. "

　　Li Tianyi is holding not camp

　　The reporters found that in all the controversy, including Yang Lan, were wrong about the fact. The son of Li Shuangjiang hit the penalty is institutionalized, instead of reeducation through labor. Institutionalization is according to the provisions of the penal code, for those taken for under 16 years of age are not subject to criminal punishment of minors compulsory education measures. The examination and approval by the local public security organ for reeducation, executed by juvenile. Reformatory period is generally 1-3 years. On institutionalized personnel, focusing on education, save.

　　Reeducation through labor according to laws and regulations of administrative management, the object is more than 16 years of age, the implementation of personnel of reeducation through labor is forced labor reform.

　　被质疑后公开向网友道歉

　　面对来自方方面面的压力，杨澜在24日晚做出回应，“我眼中的李双江老师是谦和真诚的，对他儿子一错再错，为李老师感到痛心。由于我并不了解当年李天一打人细节，因此有关劳教一年的处罚是否适当的评论是不负责任的。抱歉。法律面前人人平等，没有人可以凌驾于法律之上。

　　随后杨澜连续更新了几篇微博，都是与李天一案件有关，并向外界道歉。面对妻子被质疑，吴征站出来解围，称妻子本意是质疑劳教制度的有效性，但第一忘了先亮牌支持受害者，二不了解李当时被判劳教一年依据就发表言论，快中出错。

　　24晚11点半，杨澜再次向外界道歉，“对女性的性侵害应受到严惩是最基本的立场，是不言而喻的!我之前微博的本意是怀疑那种送劳教了事的改造方法是否真的有效，但对当年事实了解不清，不适当地提出劳教长短的问题。再次抱歉。

　　李天一是收容不是劳教

　　记者发现在所有的争论中，包括杨澜在内都弄错了一个事实。当年李双江之子打人受的处罚是收容教养，而不是劳动教养。收容教养是根据刑法的规定，对那些因不满16周岁不予刑事处罚的未成年人而采取的强制性教育改造措施。收容教养由当地公安机关审批，由少年管教所执行。收容教养期限一般为1-3年。对收容教养人员，重在教育、挽救。

　　劳动教养则依据行政管理的法律法规，对象是16周岁以上的人，对劳动教养人员实行的是强制劳动改造。