SHENZHEN, Dec. 26 -- A Chinese charity foundation is to be investigated for its role in a problematic online donation program for poor children.
The Civil Affairs Bureau of Shenzhen City in south China announced Tuesday evening that it would look into the Aiyou Future Foundation, which ran the donation program with a Beijing company from Friday to Sunday.
The program, spread via popular messaging app WeChat, allowed users to donate money to a kid born on the donor's birthday. By clicking on a link and entering his or her date of birth, users were quickly matched with a kid whose photo, name, birthday and location was available.
The program chose 366 children as beneficiaries and donations for each were capped at 1,200 yuan (183 U.S. dollars).
The novel idea attracted instant attention, but it soon found that one child had two different dates of birth with different donors. At least six such cases were uncovered by donors.
The campaign had amassed more than 2.5 million yuan as of Sunday morning, when the organizers announced the end of donations.
Facing mounting doubts, the Beijing company, 0fenbei.com, said that all the children hail from registered poor families and their information was provided by local officials.
The company said the link, which was still under trial, was mistakenly posted by its staff and therefore there was erroneous information on the children.
The Aiyou foundation registered the program with the local civil affairs bureau before its launch.
However, the campaign was initiated via the WeChat account of the Beijing company which is ineligible to accept online public donations.
"It appears obviously illegal," said Zheng Ziyin with Lawsons Law Office.
In addition, some questioned the disclosure of the children's information, even if the organizers said they had obtained written consent from the children's guardians to make the information public.
"Do the kids and their parents really understand what the disclosure means to their lives?" asked Ye Ying with China Association of Fundraising Professionals, describing the act as privacy infringement.
Xinhua failed to reach the foundation for comment.
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题2 阅读理解 第2讲
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题3 动词的时态和语态
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题5 定语从句
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题6 短文改错
2016届高考英语二轮复习练习:选修7(北师大版)
2016届高考英语二轮复习课时提升练:20 选修7 Unit 20 New Frontiers(北师大版)
2016届高考英语二轮复习课时提升练:19 选修7 Unit 19 Language(北师大版)
2016届江苏省高考英语二轮专项突破:语法 专题14 B 夹叙夹议文
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题3 七选五
2016届高三英语二轮复习周测卷:20(含解析)(河北衡水)
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题6 名词性从句
2016届高考英语二轮词法专题讲座素材:5 介词
2016届高考英语二轮复习课时提升练:17 选修6 Unit 17 Laughter(北师大版)
2016届高考英语二轮词法专题讲座素材:3 代词
2016届高考英语(新课标全国卷Ⅰ)二轮复习课件:专题1 名词、冠词和代词
2016届高考英语二轮复习课时提升练:23 选修8 Unit 23 Conflict(北师大版)
同义词Avenue,Road,Street,Way的区别
2016届高考英语二轮复习练习:选修6(北师大版)
2016届江苏省高考英语二轮专项突破:语法 专题14 C 议论文
2016届高考英语二轮词法专题讲座素材:8 动词及时态