BEIJING, June 11 -- U.S.-triggered trade frictions failed to narrow its deficit with China, but instead widened the gap, China's customs data of the first five months showed Monday.
According to the General Administration of Customs, China-U.S. goods trade dropped 9.6 percent year on year to 1.42 trillion yuan (about 206 billion U.S. dollars) during the period.
In breakdown, exports to the U.S. edged down 3.2 percent year on year to 1.09 trillion yuan, while imports from the U.S. plunged 25.7 percent year on year to 335.3 billion yuan, pushing China's surplus up 11.9 percent to 750.6 billion yuan.
China's declining trade with the U.S. mirrored that the U.S. market relied heavily on China's products, not the other way around, said Zhuang Rui, deputy dean of the Institute of International Economy from University of International Business and Economics.
Therefore, wielding the tariff stick to fix trade imbalance was a wrong move for the United States, Zhuang pointed out.
A report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce showed that the U.S. deficit in goods trade totaled 891.3 billion U.S. dollars in 2018, hitting a record high in a decade.
Referring to the deficit as a homegrown problem, Stephen S. Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, maintained that the U.S. trade deficit exposed the imbalance inside its own economy.
Last Thursday, China's Ministry of Commerce (MOC) released a research report analyzing reasons behind bilateral trade imbalance, including industrial competitiveness, international labor division and economic structure.
Only by adopting macroeconomic regulatory measures and striking a balance between supply and demand, can the U.S. utterly eliminate trade deficit with China, China's MOC report said.
If the U.S.-triggered trade frictions keep escalating, it would worsen the economic downturn both in the United States and beyond, adversely influencing different aspects of the U.S. economy, said Li Xuesong, an economist with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Cooperation is the only right choice for the two countries, and both sides should address differences through dialogue and consultations in the spirit of equality, mutual respect and benefit, Li said.
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 2 What’s the matter Mike》word版教案61
[2013春]人教版(PEP)英语三年级下册全册教案1
2015春人教PEP版英语三下《Unit 3 At the zoo》word第4课时教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 3 At the zoo》(第2课时)word教案
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 4 My Holiday》word版教案2
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》(第1课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 6 How many》(第1课时)word教案
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 2 What’s the matter Mike》word版教案6
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 4 My holiday》word版教案3
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》(第6课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》(第5课时)word教案
2015春人教PEP版英语三下《Unit 3 At the zoo》word第6课时教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 3 At the zoo》(第1课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》(第4课时)word教案
2015春人教PEP版英语三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》word教学设计
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 2 My family》(第5课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 2 My family》(第4课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》(第4课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》(第3课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》(第3课时)word教案
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 4 My Holiday》word版教案
2015春人教PEP版英语三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》word教案设计
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 5 Do you like pears》(第1课时)word教案
[2013春]人教版(PEP)英语三年级下册全册教案
2015春人教PEP版英语三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》word各课时教案
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 2 What’s the matter Mike》word版教案4
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 2 What’s the matter Mike》word版说课稿
[2013春]人教版(PEP)三下《Unit 4 Where is my car》(第6课时)word教案
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 4 My Holiday》word版
2013年人教PEP版六下《Unit 4 My holiday》word版教案1