1997年考研英语翻译真题及答案解析

　　2015年全国各地考研时间在12月份陆续进行，英语网小编将整理发布考研英语历年真题，考生可在考研历年真题栏目中查看，或点击全国考研英语作文与范文汇总，查看历年考研英语作文题目及范文，也可点击全国考研英语答案解析进行查询!祝考生们金榜题名!

　　英语网随后将陆续为大家带来更多考研英语历年真题、历年考研英语作文题目已范文、历年考研英语阅读、历年考研英语翻译、历年考研英语完型、历年考研英语答案解析等，希望能够帮助到更多的考生。

　　1997年全国考研英语翻译真题及答案解析

　　Section IV English-Chinese Translation

　　Directions:

　　Read the following passage carefully and then translate the underlined sentences into Chinese. Your translation must be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2. (15 points)

　　Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. 71) Actually, it isnt, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.

　　On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 72) Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people -- for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says I dont like this contract?

　　The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 73) It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?

　　Many deny it. 74) Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake -- a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.

　　This view, which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely logical. In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning -- the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl -- is to weigh others interests against ones own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 75) When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankinds instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.

　　71. ________

　　72. ________

　　73. ________

　　74. ________

　　75. ________

　　答案解析

　　Section IV: English-Chinese Translation (15 points)

　　71. 事实并非如此, 因为这种问法是以人们对人的权利有共同认识为基础的, 而这种共同认识并不存在。

　　72. 有些哲学家论证说, 权利只存在在于社会契约中, 是责任与权益相交换的一部分。

　　73. 这种说法从一开始就将讨论引向两个极端, 它使人们认为应这样对待动物：要么像对人类自身一样关切体谅, 要么完全冷漠无情。

　　74. 这类人持极端看法, 认为人与动物在各相关方面都不相同, 对待动物无须考虑道德问题。

　　75. 这种反应并不错, 这是人类用道德观念进行推理的本能在起作用, 这种本能应得到鼓励, 而不应遭到嘲弄。

考研英语完型 | 考研英语真题 | 考研英语阅读 | 考研英语翻译 | 考研英语经验交流

考研英语作文 | 考研常见问题 | 专家解读