Because businesses use high-quality advertising to sell low-quality products, schools should give students extensive training in how to make informed decisions before making purchases.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Some people claim that since high-quality ads are used to promote low-quality products, schools should teach students about consumerism. In my opinion, undue attention by schools to consumerism is [unnecessary and inappropriate, especially for younger students.
Regarding the first reason, empirical evidence does not suggest that high-quality advertising is used to remote low-quality products. To the contrary, companies that produce low-quality products seem to osort to low-budget, poor-quality ads, especially in broadcast media. Firms that take pride in the quality of their products are far more likely also to produce ads they can be proud of. Furthermore, high-quality products are more likely to succeed in the marketplace and thereby generate the revenues needed to ensure high production value in advertising.
As for the second reason, it is not the job of our schools to breed legions of smart shoppers. Teachers should devote class time to examining the marketplace of ideas, not that of consumer goods and services, which students spend sufficient time examining outside the classroom. Admittedly, consumerism arid advertising may be appropriate topics for college-level marketing and psychology courses. However, undue focus on media and materialism may give younger students a distortedly narrow view of the world as little more than a flea market. Additionally, revealing the deceptive side of the advertising business may breed unhealthy cynicism among youngsters, who need positive messages; not negative ones during their formative years.
In sum, the premise that high-quality ads tout low-quality products is specious at best. In any event, for schools to provide extensive training in consumerism would be to assign them an inappropriate role and to foster in impressionable minds a distortedly narrow and unhealthy view of the world.
上一篇: GMAT作文范文:理想和现实
下一篇: GMAT作文模板分享
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:53(含解析)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:39(含解析)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:45(含解析)
体坛英语资讯:Column: China has wasted 40 years for football glory, but now the race is on
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:55(含解析)
3年高考2年模拟1年原创备战2017高考精品系列之英语:专题24 新题型——短文改错(新课标、全国2卷、全国3卷、四川、浙江)(原卷版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:56(含解析)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:49(含解析)
3年高考2年模拟1年原创备战2017高考精品系列之英语:专题29 阅读表达、阅读简答(天津)(原卷版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:40(含解析)
体坛英语资讯:Bayern extend lead, Dortmund stage goal festival in German Bundesliga
2017届高考英语外研版一轮复习单元课件:4-1 Module1《life in the future》
原来不完美才是真流行?欧美少女都在疯的雀斑刺青
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.5《Theme parks》(测)(原卷版)
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.5《Theme parks》(测)(解析版)
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.4《Body language》(练)(原卷版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:60(含解析)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:41(含解析)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:54(含解析)
国内英语资讯:Chinese automaker FAW sees robust sales growth
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.5《Theme parks》(练)(解析版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:50(含解析)
3年高考2年模拟1年原创备战2017高考精品系列之英语:专题25 新题型——七选五阅读理解(原卷版)
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.4《Body language》(讲)(原卷版)
3年高考2年模拟1年原创备战2017高考精品系列之英语:专题27 标题匹配(浙江)(原卷版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:44(含解析)
体坛英语资讯:Luis Enrique throws down the gauntlet after Celta win
体坛英语资讯:Barca score 5 to remain top in Spain
2017年高考英语一轮复习讲练测:必修4.5《Theme parks》(讲)(原卷版)
2017届重庆市高考英语一轮复习阅读理解选编精练:42(含解析)