Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
中国有望成为全球最大黄金市场
纽约时装周带来的穿衣灵感
印度政府为保护老虎迁移整座村庄
林书豪26分难救主 尼克斯惜败黄蜂止连胜
调查:另一半是幸福的主要源泉
解读中国的MBA热潮
活在上海比纽约贵 全球生活成本大调查
FBI披露乔布斯档案:乔布斯个人品格遭受质疑
林书豪登上时代周刊亚洲版封面
美州立大学被曝造假 中国留学生占多数
“实习女王”的成功秘籍
美国跨种族婚姻数量达历史高峰
英国版小悦悦事件:站台昏倒10分钟 数百路人无视
雅芳海外高管涉嫌行贿中国官员
调查:为什么员工恨上司
常见礼仪十大错误 你犯了哪条?
职场女性怀孕依然广泛遭受歧视待遇
中药协回应活熊取胆:熊看起来很舒服
常冥想可以减压 你也来试试吧
英国BBC让孩子为父母办婚礼
林书豪引新秀赛破例:增补入选NBA全明星
奥巴马针对富人的增税计划
德国总统因腐败丑闻宣布辞职
激光矫正近视安全性遭质疑
阿黛尔囊括六奖横扫格莱美奖
瞧仔细了,这些只是巧合!
归真堂熊场开放被黑 姚明探望被救黑熊呼吁关爱动物
苹果商标纠纷启发Facebook在华疯狂注册商标
丁俊晖夺冠威尔士公开赛 过关斩将完胜世界第一
选择一个另类的方式过情人节
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |