Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
雅思口语经典问题:环保健康
雅思口语经典问题:体育运动
雅思口语经典试题:技能
雅思口语高分的决定性因素
雅思口语满分技巧:巧避八大扣分点
雅思口语话题:Hobby Questions
雅思口语经典试题:购物
3000词汇也能搞定雅思口语
雅思口语考试的三大杀手锏
雅思口语经典试题:课程测验
雅思口语技巧:八个人生金句
雅思口语话题联想:《甄嬛传》中的雅思口语
雅思口语经典问题:外国人
雅思口语经典问题:名人
雅思高分口语实战演练:压力苦恼
雅思口语话题经典难题十道:Invention
雅思口语中有关狗的73个短语(1)
看美剧学雅思:暮光之城经典台词
教你临场应变征服雅思口语考试
雅思口语高频词汇:天气
雅思口语经典问题:资讯广告
5月雅思变题季:雅思口语备考需注意
雅思口语:毕业租房常用英文表达
雅思口语核心词汇之“走”的表达
雅思口语满分之考场应对方法
雅思口语经典问题:音乐
雅思口语经典试题:地方
雅思高分口语实战演练:艺术技能
实用雅思口语句型100句
六招秘籍拿下雅思口语印象高分
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |