Some people said giving aid to poorer countries has more objective effects than positive effects, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Afflicted with famine, wars, diseases, people living in those poverty-stricken countries are struggling for survival. From Vietnam to Burma, from Ethiopia to Cambodia, what they worry about is where is the next meal, how to save the long-suffering familys life and what next day will be. In face of this severe situation, it is suggested that rich countries should shoulder responsibility to help them out of such harsh situation.
The opponents are of the opinion that this well-meant aid may engender unfavorable effects on the current situation. To begin with, those aids are likely to be misused by local officials. Surprising is that the poorer a country is, the higher possibility of its governments corruption, which is, actually, the root cause for its backwardness. To make it worse, citizens, once granted food and daily necessities alike, are prone to produce strong independence and reliance. It is universally acknowledged that only those countries thriving for advance on their own can really make a difference. Once the counting-on habit, which serves as a barrier to further development, is formed, to eliminate it will be a tough job.
However, proponents also have strong reasons. Primarily, the supports, financially and technologically, have turned out to be of high importance to boosting economy of poor nations. For example, powerful economies, like France, Britain, America to name just a few, can invest in domestic industries, so that more job opportunities are brought and living standard enhanced. Furthermore, it is a win-win strategy to reach out an aiding hand. Without doubt, modern technology enables the world shrink into a Village, therefore, with a few villagers suffering, an overall prosperity is nothing but a Utopia. That is to say only when hunger is conquered, when wars are quenched globally can the real comprehensive prosperity be achieved. Most important of all, those super powers, historically, were major contributors to the current trauma of those have-nots.
Overall, rich countries are definitely duty-bound to help their poor counterparts out. For one thing, it mirrors the humanism; for another, it is an indispensable procedure in realization of global peace and flourish.
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案14
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解7
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案16
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解4
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案4
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案5
2014年考研英语阅读理解题选材与方法
2014考研英语阅读冲刺练题及解析二
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案20
2014考研英语阅读理解习题及答案四
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案9
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案1
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案11
2014考研英语阅读理解练习一
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解8
考研英语二完型填空经常出现的逻辑关系
2014年考研英语阅读理解习题及答案一
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案7
专家辅导之考研英语阅读备考
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解6
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解5
2014考研英语阅读理解练习七
英语阅读之提升工作幸福感的五个秘诀
2014考研英语阅读理解习题及答案六
2014年考研英语模拟阅读理解10
2014年考研英语阅读理解试题及答案19
2014考研英语之阅读选材与复习方法
2014年考研英语阅读理解及答案解析法律类
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案3
2014年考研英语阅读试题及答案17
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |